Re: Announcing 2.18.0 widely?

2014-01-03 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
, January 02, 2014 3:37 PM Subject: Re: Announcing 2.18.0 widely? BTW, are the number of downloads recorded anywhere? It would be interesting to track this for stable releases. Google analytics should track this. If you can persuade GP to log in and check -- Phil Holmes

Announcing 2.18.0 widely?

2014-01-02 Thread David Kastrup
Apart from a note about the convert-ly accident, does anybody see a reason not to announce 2.18.0 presently to a wide audience? Or should we wait until 2.19.0 is out? I _think_ that the web site should be fine currently. -- David Kastrup ___

Re: Announcing 2.18.0 widely?

2014-01-02 Thread James
On 02/01/14 14:54, David Kastrup wrote: Apart from a note about the convert-ly accident, does anybody see a reason not to announce 2.18.0 presently to a wide audience? Or should we wait until 2.19.0 is out? I _think_ that the web site should be fine currently. Are there any considerations

Re: Announcing 2.18.0 widely?

2014-01-02 Thread David Kastrup
James pkx1...@gmail.com writes: On 02/01/14 14:54, David Kastrup wrote: Apart from a note about the convert-ly accident, does anybody see a reason not to announce 2.18.0 presently to a wide audience? Or should we wait until 2.19.0 is out? I _think_ that the web site should be fine

Re: Announcing 2.18.0 widely?

2014-01-02 Thread Trevor Daniels
David Kastrup wrote Thursday, January 02, 2014 2:54 PM Apart from a note about the convert-ly accident, does anybody see a reason not to announce 2.18.0 presently to a wide audience? Or should we wait until 2.19.0 is out? I _think_ that the web site should be fine currently. I think it's

Re: Announcing 2.18.0 widely?

2014-01-02 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk To: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org; lilypond-devel@gnu.org Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2014 3:37 PM Subject: Re: Announcing 2.18.0 widely? BTW, are the number of downloads recorded anywhere? It would be interesting to track