This patch seems to have stalled.
@David: Could you perhaps spell out more
clearly what needs to be done to meet your
objections.
Trevor
https://codereview.appspot.com/51230043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gn
On 2014/01/14 14:30:45, dak wrote:
https://codereview.appspot.com/51230043/diff/20001/ly/satb.ly#newcode75
ly/satb.ly:75: #(define-once Key *unspecified*)
I don't see that using some Scheme interface rather than providing
that facility
on the LilyPond level makes a lot of sense. For one thin
https://codereview.appspot.com/51230043/diff/20001/ly/satb.ly
File ly/satb.ly (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/51230043/diff/20001/ly/satb.ly#newcode75
ly/satb.ly:75: #(define-once Key *unspecified*)
I don't see that using some Scheme interface rather than providing that
facility on the L
LGTM
I can deal with my comment before I push
after the review if you like.
Trevor
https://codereview.appspot.com/51230043/diff/20001/ly/satb.ly
File ly/satb.ly (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/51230043/diff/20001/ly/satb.ly#newcode260
ly/satb.ly:260: \version "2.18.0"
This needs to be
