Hey all,
Han Wen - I saw that you pushed your beam collision work to master branch.
I truly feel that this is premature and I urge you to undo it. The reason I
have not pushed my patch yet is because I think more people need to chime in.
This type of collision avoidance is very important to
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu wrote:
Hey all,
Han Wen - I saw that you pushed your beam collision work to master branch.
I truly feel that this is premature and I urge you to undo it. The reason I
have not pushed my patch yet is because I think more people
On Feb 24, 2011, at 11:23 AM, Mike Solomon wrote:
On Feb 24, 2011, at 10:52 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu wrote:
Hey all,
Han Wen - I saw that you pushed your beam collision work to master branch.
I truly feel that this is
Hi,
You're cheating a bit, Mike !
This wasn't c'4~ c'8. instead of a4~ a8. in the lower voice.
It's even more tight !
Here is the example in context (Breitkopf und Härtel 1878) :
http://imslp.org/wiki/Special:ImagefromIndex/05677
The last two systems of the second page.
You can also notice a
On Feb 24, 2011, at 10:21 PM, Bertrand Bordage wrote:Hi,You're cheating a bit, Mike !This wasn't "c'4~ c'8." instead of "a4~ a8." in the lower voice.It's even more tight !
Here is the example in context (Breitkopf und Härtel 1878) :http://imslp.org/wiki/Special:ImagefromIndex/05677The last two
