W dniu 31 stycznia 2011 17:06 użytkownik Carl Sorensen
napisał:
> On 1/31/11 3:04 AM, "Jan Warchoł" wrote:
>> 2011/1/24 Phil Holmes
>>>
>>> If you use
>>>
>>> #(set-accidental-style 'modern-cautionary)
>>> then you get the parenthesised accidental automatically, as requested.
>>
>> Indeed, thank
On 2011-01-31 21:06, James Lowe wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Alexander Kobel
>> By the way: if you have { r2.. cis8( | c2!) r2 } all over the place,
>> and then there suddenly comes a { r2 cis2~ | cis2 r2 }, you'd expect an
>> additional sharp there too, don't you?
>
> Hmm...why
hello
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Kobel
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:14:23 +0100
To: Jan Warchoł
Cc: lilypond-user , bug-lilypond
, lilypond-devel
Subject: Re: Bug in ties over barlines
>By the way: if you have { r2.. cis8( | c2!) r2 } all over the place,
>and then
On 2011-01-31 11:04, Jan Warchoł wrote:
> [...] If the last note in the
> following example doesn't get a natural, it's *impossible* to tell
> that it's not another ces:
>
> ces'1~ | ces'
> ces'1( | c')
>
> It may be argued that the slur looks different than the tie, but it's
> not enough.
> I'm
On 1/31/11 3:04 AM, "Jan Warchoł" wrote:
> 2011/1/24 Phil Holmes
>>
>> If you use
>>
>> #(set-accidental-style 'modern-cautionary)
>> then you get the parenthesised accidental automatically, as requested.
>
> Indeed, thanks for the remainder.
> However, in my opinion it is necessary to *change
Hi,
sorry for the delay - i was busy making new flags for Lily.
2011/1/24 Phil Holmes
>
> - Original Message - From: "Jan Warchoł"
>
>
>> I don't agree. *Theoretically* accidental is not needed, but if it
>> would be omitted, how can you tell the difference between aes~ | aes
>> and ae
