Many thanks.
https://codereview.appspot.com/287240043/diff/1/Documentation/included/compile.itexi
File Documentation/included/compile.itexi (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/287240043/diff/1/Documentation/included/compile.itexi#newcode232
Documentation/included/compile.itexi:232: asterisk
I've just pushed a couple of updates to staging based on incidental stuff
I've discovered and benchmarked over the last couple of days. One sets the
location of the binary to what we'd now expect for using .gdbinit. The
second is based on benchmarking with and without -jX CPU_COUNT=X for the
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 03:09:44PM +, Colin Hall wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 02:54:39PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
> > "Check if the issue falls into any previous category given on the
> > relevant checklists in Bug Squad checklists. If in doubt, add a new
> > issue for a report."
> > (
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 02:54:39PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
> "Check if the issue falls into any previous category given on the
> relevant checklists in Bug Squad checklists. If in doubt, add a new
> issue for a report."
> (http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/adding-issues-to
I've updated the CG with some new stuff for the Bug Squad - mainly
information requested by the current squad or where it seemed unclear what
was meant - for example, the definition of "Regression" should now be more
explicit. It's currently in staging working through to master, but while I
wa
I've added a few updates to the CG concerning regression tests - it answers
some FAQs that have come up about regtest comparison. I took the liberty of
a direct push as 173c86fbf69abf076ec9c16147c1bf106c52b541
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mai
