Compiling LilyPond - question and documentation

2011-01-02 Thread Phil Holmes
I've been experimenting with putting trace messages in Lily by editing the source, make and then using DDD to watch what's going on. My question: What's the simplest way to revert to the proper source, rather than the stuff I've edited, to ensure my source tree is clean? In doing this, I've

Re: Compiling LilyPond - question and documentation

2011-01-02 Thread Sven Axelsson
On 2 January 2011 12:45, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote: I've been experimenting with putting trace messages in Lily by editing the source, make and then using DDD to watch what's going on.  My question: What's the simplest way to revert to the proper source, rather than the stuff I've

Re: Compiling LilyPond - question and documentation

2011-01-02 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 11:45:20AM -, Phil Holmes wrote: What's the simplest way to revert to the proper source, rather than the stuff I've edited, to ensure my source tree is clean? git reset --hard origin It's in the CG chapter on source code. In doing this, I've been following the CG.