Hello all,
When running git cl config, it asks for more info than I have found in the
current contributors' guide.
Yes, I can/could just hit a newline, but it'd be nice to have concrete answers
-- what are the correct pieces of info for:
* Tree Status URL (I put the URL of the LP git repo
Resurrecting an old thread, because I had the same questions due to
the gaps in the contributor's guide ...
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote:
> On 15 May 2012 16:35, Graham Percival wrote:
> > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 02:19:34PM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> > >
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Adam Spiers
wrote:
> Resurrecting an old thread, because I had the same questions due to
> the gaps in the contributor's guide ...
*sigh*
Just discovered that I already asked this about 13 months ago:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.devel/41
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Adam Spiers
wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Adam Spiers
> wrote:
>> Resurrecting an old thread, because I had the same questions due to
>> the gaps in the contributor's guide ...
>
> *sigh*
>
> Just discovered that I already asked this about 13 months
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 02:19:34PM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> Yes, I can/could just hit a newline, but it'd be nice to have
> concrete answers -- what are the correct pieces of info for:
quick answers here; anybody feel free to give
longer/friendlier/accurater replies.
> * Tree Stat
On 15 May 2012 16:35, Graham Percival wrote:
>
> IIRC the git-cl on my github account adds a URL which allows us to
> search for lilypond patches (which would further reduce the chance
> of lost patches). IIRC this happened a few months ago, but I
> can't remember how to do the actual searching,
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 04:51:30PM +0200, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote:
> On 15 May 2012 16:35, Graham Percival wrote:
>
> > IIRC the git-cl on my github account adds a URL which allows us to
> > search for lilypond patches (which would further reduce the chance
> > of lost patches). IIRC this happen
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote:
> On 15 May 2012 16:35, Graham Percival wrote:
>> IIRC the git-cl on my github account adds a URL which allows us to
>> search for lilypond patches (which would further reduce the chance
>> of lost patches). IIRC this happened a few month
On 15/05/12 16:35, Graham Percival wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 02:19:34PM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
Yes, I can/could just hit a newline, but it'd be nice to have
concrete answers -- what are the correct pieces of info for:
quick answers here
It seems fine to just hit enter for
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
> On 15/05/12 16:35, Graham Percival wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 02:19:34PM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, I can/could just hit a newline, but it'd be nice to have
>>> concrete answers -- what are the corr
On 15 May 2012 17:06, Graham Percival wrote:
>
> However, I must admit that I'm not certain how you did this (even
> though I read the code!). What should Joseph answer to the git-cl
> questions? If you could help him write something for the CG about
> this, that would be awesome.
I have neit
Hello,
On 15 May 2012 18:49, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote:
>
> On 15 May 2012 17:06, Graham Percival wrote:
>>
>>
>> However, I must admit that I'm not certain how you did this (even
>> though I read the code!). What should Joseph answer to the git-cl
>> questions? If you could help him write somet
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 11:57 PM, Adam Spiers
wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Adam Spiers
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Adam Spiers
>> wrote:
>>> Resurrecting an old thread, because I had the same questions due to
>>> the gaps in the contributor's guide ...
>>
>> *sigh
Hello
On 26 January 2013 13:38, Adam Spiers wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 11:57 PM, Adam Spiers
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Adam Spiers
> > wrote:
> >> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Adam Spiers
> >> wrote:
> >>> Resurrecting an old thread, because I had the same ques
James writes:
> I guess it might have been worse if you'd pushed to master and not
> staging as well when you realised your mistake,
Worse? No. Diagnostics for a problematic situation? Yes.
Our scripts are quite good at not messing with mistakes, so there is no
real point in rushing out a fi
Hello,
On 26 January 2013 15:47, David Kastrup wrote:
> James writes:
>
> > I guess it might have been worse if you'd pushed to master and not
> > staging as well when you realised your mistake,
>
> Worse? No. Diagnostics for a problematic situation? Yes.
>
> Our scripts are quite good at no
16 matches
Mail list logo
