Copyright issues

2009-09-07 Thread Patrick McCarty
Hi, In light of recent suggestions to change LilyPond's copyright to GPLv2 or later, I am reminded of the Ghostscript 8.70 announcement to gs-devel back in July. It is here: http://www.ghostscript.com/pipermail/gs-devel/2009-July/008545.html The part that (I think) is relevant to LilyPond is

Re: Copyright issues

2009-09-07 Thread Graham Percival
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 04:42:07PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote: In light of recent suggestions to change LilyPond's copyright to GPLv2 or later, I am reminded of the Ghostscript 8.70 announcement to gs-devel back in July. Thoughts? Yes. My thoughts are could people reading the maoing

Re: Copyright issues

2009-09-07 Thread Patrick McCarty
On 2009-09-08, Graham Percival wrote: On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 04:42:07PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote: In light of recent suggestions to change LilyPond's copyright to GPLv2 or later, I am reminded of the Ghostscript 8.70 announcement to gs-devel back in July. Thoughts? If you meant

Re: Copyright issues

2009-09-07 Thread Joe Neeman
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 01:05 +0100, Graham Percival wrote: On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 04:42:07PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote: In light of recent suggestions to change LilyPond's copyright to GPLv2 or later, I am reminded of the Ghostscript 8.70 announcement to gs-devel back in July.

Re: Copyright issues

2009-09-07 Thread Patrick McCarty
On 2009-09-07, Joe Neeman wrote: On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 01:05 +0100, Graham Percival wrote: On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 04:42:07PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote: In light of recent suggestions to change LilyPond's copyright to GPLv2 or later, I am reminded of the Ghostscript 8.70 announcement

<    1   2