On Feb 7, 2011, at 12:18 PM, Jan Warchoł wrote:
> 2011/2/7 Mike Solomon :
>> Is it supposed to be repositioned so high on the staff?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> MS
>
> I see 'extra-offset '(-2 . 5) and the tie is just about 2 staffspaces
> to the left and 5 staffspaces above its default position, so it loo
2011/2/7 Mike Solomon :
> Is it supposed to be repositioned so high on the staff?
>
> Cheers,
> MS
I see 'extra-offset '(-2 . 5) and the tie is just about 2 staffspaces
to the left and 5 staffspaces above its default position, so it looks
all right to me...
cheers,
Janek
While trying to eradicate the bug that's been giving me problems today, I found
this:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/extending/difficult-tweaks
I think it's the same issue. Das ist nicht gut :(
Should I git-bisect, or is someone already working on this?
~Mike
Mike Solomon ufl.edu> writes:
> While trying to eradicate the bug that's been giving me problems today,
> I found this:
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/extending/difficult-tweaks
>
> I think it's the same issue. Das ist nicht gut :(
>
If you are talking about the example under
Is it supposed to be repositioned so high on the staff?
Cheers,
MS
On Feb 7, 2011, at 1:20, Keith OHara wrote:
> Mike Solomon ufl.edu> writes:
>
>> While trying to eradicate the bug that's been giving me problems today,
>> I found this:
>> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/extendi
