The part of notation.pdf before the tables grows from 613 to 622 pages,
2%, even with the closing }s always on their own line.
https://codereview.appspot.com/237340043/diff/110001/Documentation/learning/common-notation.itely
File Documentation/learning/common-notation.itely (right):
https://cod
LGTM
Thanks Keith
https://codereview.appspot.com/237340043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
https://codereview.appspot.com/237340043/diff/110001/Documentation/learning/tweaks.itely
File Documentation/learning/tweaks.itely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/237340043/diff/110001/Documentation/learning/tweaks.itely#newcode330
Documentation/learning/tweaks.itely:330: b c }
On 2015/06
https://codereview.appspot.com/237340043/diff/110001/Documentation/learning/tweaks.itely
File Documentation/learning/tweaks.itely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/237340043/diff/110001/Documentation/learning/tweaks.itely#newcode330
Documentation/learning/tweaks.itely:330: b c }
On 2015/06
I'm generally happy with this, but I've made quite a few nit-picking
comments. I think it is important that the manuals rigorously show a
consistent style, particularly with regard to indentation and the
placement of block delimiters. We frequently criticise users presenting
examples on the mail
I started this with the belief that relative octave notation is easier
to write (for some people) but absolute octave notation is easier to
read, and thus the expectation that many examples would be simpler using
absolute pitches, or the new \fixed c'' {}.
However, there were not so many examples
Reviewers: Trevor Daniels,
Message:
On 2015/05/17 21:54:07, Trevor Daniels wrote:
But I think if are to
make this change it would also be good to say what leaving out
\relative means.
It was difficult to do this before as all the examples left it out
(apparently).
Now we can do it. Placin
I'm not opposed to the change to explicit \relative; it avoids having to
explain why it was omitted in the examples, and makes the example code
more exactly correspond to the code obtained by clicking on the image.
But I think if are to make this change it would also be good to say what
leaving ou
