Patch pushed
91ca3dbe2cd40f8eedce48ee02c7c98a2ec89413
http://codereview.appspot.com/6347062/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/6347062/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 2012/07/06 07:38:05, dak wrote:
Yes, it's best to drop the verb. That is more consistent
with the rest of the table. But we are nitpicking here, aren't we :)
Done.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6347062/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-de
http://codereview.appspot.com/6347062/diff/1002/Documentation/notation/input.itely
File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6347062/diff/1002/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode1017
Documentation/notation/input.itely:1017: @item (on-page nmbr)
@ta
http://codereview.appspot.com/6347062/diff/1002/Documentation/notation/input.itely
File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6347062/diff/1002/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode1017
Documentation/notation/input.itely:1017: @item (on-page nmbr)
@ta
On 2012/07/05 12:48:32, thomasmorley65 wrote:
Please add the newly implemented on-page-feature.
Done. I changed the description to fit better with
the column heading of the table.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6347062/
___
lilypond-devel mailing l
http://codereview.appspot.com/6347062/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely
File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6347062/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode1018
Documentation/notation/input.itely:1018: @item not-first-page
@tab not
Omitted to add -devel to Reviewers when I uploaded this patch.
Trevor
http://codereview.appspot.com/6347062/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
