On 2012/01/13 16:59:47, Graham Percival wrote:
On 2012/01/13 16:56:54, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> I don't think I can close this.
That is quite correct -- James Lowe owns this issue, so only he can
close it.
Sorry, I didn't realise I had the Rietveld as well.
Closed.
http://codereview.appspot.c
On 2012/01/13 16:56:54, Pavel Roskin wrote:
I don't think I can close this.
That is quite correct -- James Lowe owns this issue, so only he can
close it.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5530043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
h
I don't think I can close this. I see gray "Can't Edit" over
"Publish+Mail Comments". I tried adding my gnu.org address as an alias
in gmail but it changed nothing. Sorry for not being able to
participate more in the discussion!
http://codereview.appspot.com/5530043/
_
Pavel,
This patch has been approved and pushed.
committer James Lowe
Fri, 13 Jan 2012 11:54:08 + (11:54 +)
commit 427bb2b004227f3afc7de10dfd896fc375cbc320
Please can you close this Rietveld issue?
Thank you for your patch.
James
http://codereview.appspot.com/5530043/
___
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 12:15:43AM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Quoting Graham Percival :
>
> >Great point! Could you add a comment to this effect to the top of
> >this file? there's no way that I'll remember otherwise.
>
> I believe the comment belongs to some other file that describes the
> r
Quoting Graham Percival :
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 02:10:24PM +, plros...@gmail.com wrote:
I totally share your sentiment, but we depend on an external entity
here, which we cannot control. Suppose we go from 2.15.x to 2.17.x and
put the documentation under "v2.17". For some time, Google w
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 02:10:24PM +, plros...@gmail.com wrote:
> I totally share your sentiment, but we depend on an external entity
> here, which we cannot control. Suppose we go from 2.15.x to 2.17.x and
> put the documentation under "v2.17". For some time, Google won't have
> the new loca
- Original Message -
From:
To: ;
Cc: ;
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: Doc search: update to version 2.15, use it in the "site:"
part(issue 5530043)
I totally share your sentiment, but we depend on an external entity
here, which we cannot control.
I totally share your sentiment, but we depend on an external entity
here, which we cannot control. Suppose we go from 2.15.x to 2.17.x and
put the documentation under "v2.17". For some time, Google won't have
the new location in its index, so the search would get nothing. It
would be better to
I really don't like the hard-coded numbers, but I suppose I can't
complain -- the patch doesn't make it any worse in that respect.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5530043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailm
Reviewers: ,
Message:
Added Pavel as a CC in case there are any comments from anyone - then he
can see them
Description:
Doc search: update to version 2.15, use it in the "site:" part
site:lilypond.org/doc/v2.15 means that we want to look only under that
directory. Leading plus doesn't force t
11 matches
Mail list logo
