Re: FYI: Status of Ancient Notation Implementation

2006-10-12 Thread Ralph Little
Attached patch should fix this one and theoretically even *speed up* glyph name lookup, since it removes obsolete scheme code. Instead of trying to fix the scheme code, I added a new longa note head to the feta font. It looks exactly like a brevis head, but with a stem like quarter note.

Re: FYI: Status of Ancient Notation Implementation

2006-10-11 Thread Juergen Reuter
On Sun, 8 Oct 2006, Juergen Reuter wrote: * The longa notes bug (cp. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2006-10/msg00022.html) has been tracked down to a general problem in output-lib.scm (see http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2006-10/msg00050.html for details).

Re: FYI: Status of Ancient Notation Implementation

2006-10-11 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Juergen Reuter schreef: font. It looks exactly like a brevis head, but with a stem like quarter note. Maximae are not handled by this patch, but I actually have not ever seen a Maxima in modern font, so this is a generally open issue to be handled separately. May I apply this patch? cool.

Re: FYI: Status of Ancient Notation Implementation

2006-10-11 Thread Graham Percival
Juergen Reuter wrote: Graham, what do you think, should this patch be applied? Without this patch, the reader of the documentation immediately sees that there must be something wrong but is left alone, as the figure does not show what is explained in the text. With the attached patch, the

Re: FYI: Status of Ancient Notation Implementation

2006-10-09 Thread Juergen Reuter
On Sun, 8 Oct 2006, Juergen Reuter wrote: * Section 7.7.7: The episem articulation does not appear (there should be a horizontal line above the three last noteheads). In 2.7.x, the right ending was badly placed; now the episem is completely invisible. Also, the text scripts are colliding

Re: FYI: Status of Ancient Notation Implementation

2006-10-09 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Juergen Reuter schreef: Of course, I would like to get this bug fixed, but it looks like I would have to rewrite major parts of TextSpanner and LineSpanner. LineSpanner and esp. TextSpanner is a complete mess, with text-dynamics, trills, brackets etc. all using the same code in zillions of

Re: FYI: Status of Ancient Notation Implementation

2006-10-09 Thread Juergen Reuter
On Mon, 9 Oct 2006, Geoff Horton wrote: FWIW, I'm not sure that the horizontal episema is best done with a TextSpanner anyhow. In Solesmes notation, at least, it goes right over the notes, not over the staff. Gepff Right. But I vaguely remember (I may be wrong) that a long time ago,

Re: FYI: Status of Ancient Notation Implementation

2006-10-08 Thread Juergen Reuter
On Sun, 8 Oct 2006, Juergen Reuter wrote: * Section 7.7.10.1, second figure: Ligature brackets are not at all displayed anymore. Same problem also in the introductionary Section 7.7.10. Should be fixed now in cvs. The adaption to the new stream event code was incomplete. Greetings,

FYI: Status of Ancient Notation Implementation

2006-10-07 Thread Juergen Reuter
Hi all, just for the record in expectation of lily 2.10, here is a summary report of known _NEW_ bugs in ancient notation that were newly introduced in the 2.9.x series. I list them here as a collective todo list, for myself remembering them easier, but also for anybody else interested in