Re: Feature? Bug? (part 1)

2011-02-07 Thread Mike Solomon
beambug.ly Description: Binary data probably not the most minimal example in the world, but it gets the job done! Cheers, MS On Feb 6, 2011, at 11:35 PM, Colin Campbell wrote: > On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 10:14 -0500, Mike Solomon wrote: >> Hey all, >> >> In the attached png, you'll see that the

Re: Feature? Bug? (part 1)

2011-02-07 Thread Colin Campbell
On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 10:14 -0500, Mike Solomon wrote: > Hey all, > > In the attached png, you'll see that the feathered beam resets to 0 feather @ > the line break. Actually, it even regresses a bit: you'll see that it's > actually fatter at the linebreak than it is a couple beats after, after

Re: Feature? Bug? (part 1)

2011-02-07 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 2/6/11 8:14 AM, "Mike Solomon" wrote: > Hey all, > > In the attached png, you'll see that the feathered beam resets to 0 feather @ > the line break. Actually, it even regresses a bit: you'll see that it's > actually fatter at the linebreak than it is a couple beats after, after which > it

Feature? Bug? (part 1)

2011-02-06 Thread Mike Solomon
Hey all, In the attached png, you'll see that the feathered beam resets to 0 feather @ the line break. Actually, it even regresses a bit: you'll see that it's actually fatter at the linebreak than it is a couple beats after, after which it starts to spread out again. I would argue that the la