2011/7/26 Reinhold Kainhofer :
> PS: I like the idea of using ties for the extenders, because that's exactly
> what an extender is meant to express!
+1! +1!
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/li
Am Dienstag, 26. Juli 2011, 12:33:03 schrieb Bertrand Bordage:
> Yes, this probably needs to be discussed during the GLISS.
> But maybe we can do something before, because adding the "tilde notation"
> doesn't mean that the current syntax must be removed.
But implementing both systems is a lot mo
Yes, this probably needs to be discussed during the GLISS.
But maybe we can do something before, because adding the "tilde notation"
doesn't mean that the current syntax must be removed.
Bertrand
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
htt
+1
...GLISS?
cheers,
Janek
2011/7/25 Bertrand Bordage :
> Hi all,
> I am currently working on some huge figured bass projects and there's
> something truely annoying and quite unnatural:
> when using \bassFigureExtendersOn, we need to tell LilyPond when we don't
> want an extender (by adding \! to
Le 25/07/2011 13:56, Bertrand Bordage disait :
Hi all,
I am currently working on some huge figured bass projects and there's
something truely annoying and quite unnatural:
when using \bassFigureExtendersOn, we need to tell LilyPond when we don't
want an extender (by adding \! to the number) inst
Hi all,
I am currently working on some huge figured bass projects and there's
something truely annoying and quite unnatural:
when using \bassFigureExtendersOn, we need to tell LilyPond when we don't
want an extender (by adding \! to the number) instead of telling when we
want one.
I'm making a lot
