This was just pushed by Mike.
I close the issue.
thanks,
Janek
http://codereview.appspot.com/4625067/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
lgtm
I can see how this will work well for defining a whole set.
Carl
http://codereview.appspot.com/4625067/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM
(I am assuming the glyphs don't change)
http://codereview.appspot.com/4625067/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Reviewers: carl.d.sorensen_gmail.com, MikeSol,
Message:
This is an intermediate step that will be needed for shortened flags.
Description:
Flag functions instead of defining glyphs directly
We will need many length variants of every flag.
Therefore instead of writing flag code directly
in
