Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
Hello again..
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 5:34 AM, Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:46 AM, Reinhold Kainhofer
reinh...@fam.tuwien.ac.at wrote:
Am Friday, 23. September 2011, 04:35:06 schrieben Sie:
fatal error: failed
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
Hello again..
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 5:34 AM, Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:46 AM, Reinhold Kainhofer
reinh...@fam.tuwien.ac.at wrote:
Am Friday, 23. September 2011, 04:35:06
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 09:55:26AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
I am somewhat surprised that the patch passed testing by someone else,
though. It would seem that doc builds are not part of that.
I think that James only does a normal make and make check; that's
doable in 3 minutes on his
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Here is the problem: \with-link declares its argument type wrong
(declares symbol? and uses #label, a string). My patch has the
side-effect that markup commands actually check their argument lists for
correctness. Previously it just let any Scheme argument
On Fr., 23. Sep. 2011 09:55:26 CEST, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
I am somewhat surprised that the patch passed testing by someone else,
though. It would seem that doc builds are not part of that.
Nope, because it's the regtetsts' task, so only the regtests are checked. It's
also a
Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com writes:
On Fr., 23. Sep. 2011 09:55:26 CEST, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
I am somewhat surprised that the patch passed testing by someone else,
though. It would seem that doc builds are not part of that.
Nope, because it's the regtetsts'
Hello,
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 09:55:26AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
I am somewhat surprised that the patch passed testing by someone else,
though. It would seem that doc builds are not part of that.
I think
While we are at it: the docs compilation failed tonight...
Unfortunately, the output does not give any error message, so I have no idea
what is wrong.
Cheers,
Reinhold
-- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --
Betreff: GDP Docs compilation FAILED (2011.09.23-03:32)
Datum: Friday, 23.
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 03:35:26AM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
While we are at it: the docs compilation failed tonight...
Thanks!
Unfortunately, the output does not give any error message, so I have no idea
what is wrong.
Well, the output contains this:
...
fatal error: failed files:
Hello,
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:46 AM, Reinhold Kainhofer
reinh...@fam.tuwien.ac.at wrote:
Am Friday, 23. September 2011, 04:35:06 schrieben Sie:
fatal error: failed files: be/lily-48175def.ly
A decent build system would take that filename, grep it for
\sourcefilename, and tell us *that*
Hello again..
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 5:34 AM, Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:46 AM, Reinhold Kainhofer
reinh...@fam.tuwien.ac.at wrote:
Am Friday, 23. September 2011, 04:35:06 schrieben Sie:
fatal error: failed files: be/lily-48175def.ly
A decent
11 matches
Mail list logo
