Hi,
Keith, somehow i had overlooked this part of your email:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Keith OHara wrote:
> For any changed test then, it is probably worth reading the header, to
> see if a subtle change that looks harmless happens to be the point of
> the test (and would presumably cause
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 05:48:48PM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Graham Percival
>> wrote:
>> > To avoid slowing down programming to a crawl, I figure that we’ll
>> > identify some subset of these regtest
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 05:48:48PM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
> > To avoid slowing down programming to a crawl, I figure that we’ll
> > identify some subset of these regtests and have a separate make
> > regtests-quick command which onl
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 6:07 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Janek Warchoł writes:
>
>> What about something like this:
>> when a regression against latest stable is found, it's not marked as
>> critical (as Graham suggests). However, when we make a stable
>> release, all regressions present in the t
Janek Warchoł writes:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 11:50 PM, Trevor Daniels
> wrote:
>> So far there have been c. 75 critical regressions under the
>> current definition of 'critical' since 2.14. All but one have been
>> fixed, many of them promptly. This prompt attention IMO
>> is due only to t
Hi All, Graham,
first, let me apologise for not responding promptly.
Secondly, here's my reply to Graham's almost-original proposition;
i'll send a reply to current discussion ("Clear policy discussions")
separately.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> Let’s drop the “any
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 05:33:47AM +, Keith OHara wrote:
> Graham Percival percival-music.ca> writes:
> > -any regression test which fails to compile or shows incorrect
> > output.
>
> For any changed test then, it is probably worth reading the header, to
> see if a subtle change that l
Graham Percival percival-music.ca> writes:
>
> Let’s drop the “any unintended change” thing, and go totally with
> the regression tests. Tests pass? We can make a stable release.
I don't know. Maybe that would be alright. I'm not sure.
The 'Regression' label would be come more important, becau
Not quite up to the ideal standard of GOP proposals, but there's a
lot of interest and this should be enough to see what way the wind
is blowing.
html-formatted version:
http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_3.html
*** Summary
Let’s drop the “any unintended change” thing, and go totally with
the
