Re: GOP2-3: GLISS (update 1)

2012-08-01 Thread m...@apollinemike.com
On 31 juil. 2012, at 14:03, Graham Percival wrote: On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:26:12AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote: Graham Percival wrote Monday, July 30, 2012 7:11 PM \version 2.16.0 \score { ... \midi {} } Currently this code produces no pdf and, if \layout {} is added, no

Re: GOP2-3: GLISS (update 1)

2012-07-31 Thread Trevor Daniels
Graham Percival wrote Monday, July 30, 2012 7:11 PM ** Subset for first phase In greater detail: I’m suggesting that we have multiple rounds of syntax stabilization. The proposed elements of current lilypond notation which we will stabilize is captured by these two files: \version

Re: GOP2-3: GLISS (update 1)

2012-07-31 Thread Graham Percival
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:26:12AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote: Graham Percival wrote Monday, July 30, 2012 7:11 PM \version 2.16.0 \score { ... \midi {} } Currently this code produces no pdf and, if \layout {} is added, no titles. Was this an intentional suggestion for a

GOP2-3: GLISS (update 1)

2012-07-30 Thread Graham Percival
There seems to be fairly broad support for _some_ form of standardization. Here's an update of the proposal along those lines, along with brief responses to common concerns, in order to let people just joining the discussion to skip the past 50 emails. Better formatting here: