Re: GUB progress?

2019-02-24 Thread John Mandereau
Werner LEMBERG wrote: > Yes, I could try to generate the packages and upload them to a given > place.  However, I've never done a lilypond release before, so any > guidance would be helpful. I hope the guidance from our Contributors' Guide is as good for this as it has been for me to get back to

Re: GUB progress?

2019-02-24 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> I got no reply from my last comment on #59, so I went for closing > it. I merged all others from #53 to #62. I'm not as certain for #61 > and #62 as for others, but I observed no regression with them and > nobody else commented. Thanks! > There are also old open pull requests left, do you

Re: GUB progress?

2019-02-24 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Please could you confirm which ones can happily be applied - is it > all from #53 (fontconfig: Avoid access...) to #62 (Enable ... on > macOS) or a subset? John already took action, and Knut will certainly comment soon :-) Werner ___

Re: GUB progress?

2019-02-24 Thread John Mandereau
Werner LEMBERG wrote: > we had some good progress with GUB.  However, in the last few weeks > the development stalled, which is not good.  I thus propose the > following. > > * The pull requests as described in > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2019-01/msg0022 > 1.html >

Re: GUB progress?

2019-02-24 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "Werner LEMBERG" To: ; Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2019 6:50 AM Subject: GUB progress? Folks, we had some good progress with GUB. However, in the last few weeks the development stalled, which is not good. I thus propose the following.

GUB progress?

2019-02-23 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Folks, we had some good progress with GUB. However, in the last few weeks the development stalled, which is not good. I thus propose the following. * The pull requests as described in https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2019-01/msg00221.html should finally be applied.

Re: gub progress

2006-06-09 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Monday 05 June 2006 01:48, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Erik Sandberg schreef: I have GS_LIB= /home/erik/lily/gub/gub/target/linux/system/usr/bin/../share/ghostscript /8.50/lib: /home/erik/lily/gub/gub/target/linux/system/usr/bin/../share/ghostscript/ 8.50/Resource that's really strange.

Re: gub progress

2006-06-09 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Erik Sandberg schreef: On Monday 05 June 2006 01:48, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Erik Sandberg schreef: I have GS_LIB= /home/erik/lily/gub/gub/target/linux/system/usr/bin/../share/ghostscript /8.50/lib: /home/erik/lily/gub/gub/target/linux/system/usr/bin/../share/ghostscript/ 8.50/Resource that's

Re: gub progress

2006-06-05 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Sun, 4 Jun 2006, Pedro Kröger wrote: Johannes Schindelin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: although you are free to call me an idiot. no need to do that :-) ;-) - The repository format itself is fragile, just as cvs'. It is based on patches, so if there is one single patch corrupt,

Re: gub progress

2006-06-04 Thread Pedro Kröger
Johannes Schindelin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Also, if you want to ditch cvs, you always leave somebody behind. For example, from what I understand, Han-Wen likes darcs very much... and I know plenty people (me included) who don't like it. Same goes for every version control system, but at

Re: gub progress

2006-06-04 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Sun, 4 Jun 2006, Pedro Kröger wrote: Johannes Schindelin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Also, if you want to ditch cvs, you always leave somebody behind. For example, from what I understand, Han-Wen likes darcs very much... and I know plenty people (me included) who don't like it.

Re: gub progress

2006-06-04 Thread Pedro Kröger
Johannes Schindelin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: although you are free to call me an idiot. no need to do that :-) - It does not seem to focus on version control, but on changing the order of patches. this is kind of true (I don't know enought about darcs to say it's totaly true) - It lacks

Re: gub progress

2006-06-04 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Erik Sandberg schreef: Additional diagnostics: $ target/linux/system/usr/bin/gs GPL Ghostscript 8.50: Can't find initialization file gs_init.ps. $ find target/linux/system -name gs_init.ps target/linux/system/usr/share/ghostscript/8.50/lib/gs_init.ps I'm not sure if this is supposed to work; I

gub progress

2006-06-03 Thread Erik Sandberg
Hi, Now gub builds correctly. However, when I invoke lilypond (target/linux/system/usr/bin/lilypond), it consistently fails when converting to pdf. Additional diagnostics: $ target/linux/system/usr/bin/gs GPL Ghostscript 8.50: Can't find initialization file gs_init.ps. $ find

Re: gub progress

2006-06-03 Thread Christian Hitz
Am 03.06.2006 um 18:51 schrieb Erik Sandberg: Additional diagnostics: $ target/linux/system/usr/bin/gs GPL Ghostscript 8.50: Can't find initialization file gs_init.ps. $ find target/linux/system -name gs_init.ps target/linux/system/usr/share/ghostscript/8.50/lib/gs_init.ps $ Ideas? To

Re: gub progress

2006-06-03 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Sat, 3 Jun 2006, Erik Sandberg wrote: Also, what's the next step once lilypond-HEAD works nicely? I suppose the first step is to make a local mirror of the lily cvs repository; in that case, any suggestions for a good choice of version control system? I already proposed git, but you

Re: gub progress

2006-06-03 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Saturday 03 June 2006 22:14, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: 2006/6/3, Erik Sandberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Now gub builds correctly. However, when I invoke lilypond (target/linux/system/usr/bin/lilypond), it consistently fails when converting to pdf. Additional diagnostics: $