On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 02:43:46PM +, d...@gnu.org wrote:
> "Incorrect title (from book)"
> "Correct title (from bookpart)"
> and similar. That way, it is easier to see whether the results are as
> expected.
sure, that sounds good.
- Graham
___
li
LGTM, seems to work correctly on all my (reg)tests.
I actually like David's idea of changing the header field values to
include correctness information. Still I like comments inside sample
code to make the reasons for a particular block clearer.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6445053/
_
Reviewers: Graham Percival,
Message:
On 2012/07/30 14:35:05, Graham Percival wrote:
LGTM, and I really like the comments in the regtests.
Not me who can claim credit.
In a few instances they
were slightly unclear, though.
I did not even bother looking at them. You'll probably tear your ha
LGTM, and I really like the comments in the regtests. In a few
instances they were slightly unclear, though.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6445053/diff/2001/input/regression/header-book-multiple.ly
File input/regression/header-book-multiple.ly (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6445053/dif
