Am 28.01.2011 20:42, schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 04:18:16PM -0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
lilypond -p 0
Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de writes:
If this is done similar to LaTeX packages where you can enable the
option draft
to speed up compiling, and if everything looks ok, you remove the draft and
that's it, then this would be not too confusing for users.
draft Mode in LaTeX omits details but does
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 09:46:23AM +0100, Marc Hohl wrote:
What about something like
\draftModeOn / \draftModeOff ?
How about four named modes:
Screen mode - Fastest but good enough for checking on screen. Useful if lily
is being used as a composition tool.
Draft mode - Not that beautiful
Bernard Hurley bern...@marcade.biz writes:
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 09:46:23AM +0100, Marc Hohl wrote:
What about something like
\draftModeOn / \draftModeOff ?
How about four named modes:
Screen mode - Fastest but good enough for checking on screen. Useful
if lily is being used as a
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:55 AM, m...@apollinemike.com
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
Despite the joke, this is a semi-serious suggestion that I've been
hoping that somebody might be interested in for years. There's a
bunch of options that we can enable or disable to change the
amount of
On Jan 29, 2011, at 10:10 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:55 AM, m...@apollinemike.com
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
Despite the joke, this is a semi-serious suggestion that I've been
hoping that somebody might be interested in for years. There's a
bunch of options
Am 29.01.2011 09:50, schrieb David Kastrup:
Marc Hohlm...@hohlart.de writes:
If this is done similar to LaTeX packages where you can enable the
option draft
to speed up compiling, and if everything looks ok, you remove the draft and
that's it, then this would be not too confusing for users.
On Jan 29, 2011, at 10:50 AM, Marc Hohl wrote:
Am 29.01.2011 09:50, schrieb David Kastrup:
Marc Hohlm...@hohlart.de writes:
If this is done similar to LaTeX packages where you can enable the
option draft
to speed up compiling, and if everything looks ok, you remove the draft and
that's
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 1:37 PM, m...@apollinemike.com
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
Hey Hanwen,
What you describe above is close-ish to what I wound up putting in my newest
I don't think so, since the main scoring loops still loop through all
combinations in no particular order.
I looked
On Jan 29, 2011, at 1:21 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 1:37 PM, m...@apollinemike.com
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
Hey Hanwen,
What you describe above is close-ish to what I wound up putting in my newest
I don't think so, since the main scoring loops still loop
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu wrote:
Hey all,
I have a new Issue 37 fix.
The attached patch set implements a 2-pass approach through the quanting that
is potentially a huge time drain in scores with lots of collisions, but
likely not a time drain for most
inline: hanwen6.png
I cooked up this musical example that shows both responses to upward and
downward pressure to give you an idea of where I'm coming from.
Is there a way to get this type of collision avoidance w/o a 2nd quanting pass?
Cheers,
~Mike
On Jan 28, 2011, at 7:45 AM, Han-Wen
Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu writes:
I cooked up this musical example that shows both responses to upward
and downward pressure to give you an idea of where I'm coming from.
Is there a way to get this type of collision avoidance w/o a 2nd
quanting pass?
Actually, it would appear a third
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 02:38:56PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu writes:
I cooked up this musical example that shows both responses to upward
and downward pressure to give you an idea of where I'm coming from.
Is there a way to get this type of collision
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 02:38:56PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu writes:
I cooked up this musical example that shows both responses to upward
and downward pressure to give you an idea of where I'm coming from.
On Jan 28, 2011, at 8:43 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 02:38:56PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu writes:
I cooked up this musical example that shows both responses to upward
and downward pressure to give you an idea of where I'm coming from.
pressed send too soon.
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu wrote:
I cooked up this musical example that shows both responses to upward and
downward pressure to give you an idea of where I'm
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu wrote:
I cooked up this musical example that shows both responses to upward and
downward pressure to give you an idea of where I'm coming from.
Is there a way to get this type of collision avoidance w/o a 2nd quanting
pass?
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
I cooked up this musical example that shows both responses to upward
and downward pressure to give you an idea of where I'm coming from.
Is there a way to get this type of collision avoidance w/o a 2nd
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 04:18:16PM -0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
lilypond -p 0 my_file.ly % for quick work
lilypond -p 2 my_file.ly % for a draft to print out
lilypond -p 9 my_file.ly % for the
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 04:18:16PM -0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
lilypond -p 0 my_file.ly % for quick work
lilypond -p 2
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 05:42:56PM -0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
That's actually precisely why I'm suggesting a
-p X
option.
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 07:26:14PM -0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
I see nothing wrong with providing easy-to-use optimization
levels, as long as it's possible to dig down and find out what
they all do. I've
On Jan 28, 2011, at 6:12 PM, Mike Solomon wrote:
On Jan 28, 2011, at 1:15 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
pressed send too soon.
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu wrote:
I cooked up this
Hey all,
I have a new Issue 37 fix.
The attached patch set implements a 2-pass approach through the quanting that
is potentially a huge time drain in scores with lots of collisions, but likely
not a time drain for most scores. The problem is that the quanting algorithm,
by fixing a region
25 matches
Mail list logo
