I believe the attached patch fixes issue 879. Don't think it's a big deal,
but it was flagged as a frog task so I thought I'd contribute. I have run
my own regtest checker against the regtests and there were no differences.
Please could someone with git access check and push if it's OK
On 1/7/11 8:28 AM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
I believe the attached patch fixes issue 879. Don't think it's a big deal,
but it was flagged as a frog task so I thought I'd contribute. I have run
my own regtest checker against the regtests and there were no differences.
Please
- Original Message -
From: Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 7:40 PM
Subject: Re: Issue 879
Phil Holmes mail at philholmes.net writes:
\remove Hara_kiri_engraver
\consists Hara_kiri_engraver
I know I don't properly
Phil Holmes mail at philholmes.net writes:
\remove Hara_kiri_engraver
\consists Hara_kiri_engraver
I know I don't properly understand this stuff still, but doesn't the
\consists re-instate the previously removed engraver on the line above?
You are correct.
I looked at the history of
Is about knees, crossing staves, and the RemoveEmptyStaff command. It took
me to engraver-init.ly where I found:
RemoveEmptyStaves = \with {
\remove Axis_group_engraver
\remove Hara_kiri_engraver
\consists Hara_kiri_engraver
\override Beam #'auto-knee-gap = #'()
\override
