On 1/7/11 8:28 AM, "Phil Holmes" wrote:
> I believe the attached patch fixes issue 879. Don't think it's a big deal,
> but it was flagged as a frog task so I thought I'd contribute. I have run
> my own regtest checker against the regtests and there w
I believe the attached patch fixes issue 879. Don't think it's a big deal,
but it was flagged as a frog task so I thought I'd contribute. I have run
my own regtest checker against the regtests and there were no differences.
Please could someone with git access check and
- Original Message -
From: "Keith OHara"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 7:40 PM
Subject: Re: Issue 879
Phil Holmes philholmes.net> writes:
\remove "Hara_kiri_engraver"
\consists "Hara_kiri_engraver"
I know I don't properly unders
Phil Holmes philholmes.net> writes:
> \remove "Hara_kiri_engraver"
> \consists "Hara_kiri_engraver"
>
> I know I don't properly understand this stuff still, but doesn't the
> \consists re-instate the previously removed engraver on the line above?
>
You are correct.
I looked at the history
Is about knees, crossing staves, and the RemoveEmptyStaff command. It took
me to engraver-init.ly where I found:
RemoveEmptyStaves = \with {
\remove "Axis_group_engraver"
\remove "Hara_kiri_engraver"
\consists "Hara_kiri_engraver"
\override Beam #'auto-knee-gap = #'()
\override VerticalAx
