Graham Percival wrote Friday, July 31, 2009 3:05 AM
Could you redistribute the material in LM 5.2 Scores and parts
elsewhere in the LM? Maybe beef up LM 2.4.1, maybe insert a new
LM 2.4.2 that continues the scores and parts theme, maybe
something in LM 3... whatever.
Done. I made a new
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 09:18:45AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Graham Percival wrote Friday, July 31, 2009 3:05 AM
Could you redistribute the material in LM 5.2 Scores and parts
elsewhere in the LM? Maybe beef up LM 2.4.1, maybe insert a new
Done. I made a new subsection at the end of LM
Graham Percival wrote Friday, July 31, 2009 10:50 AM
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 09:18:45AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
It also uses \include, which isn't introduced anywhere, but
Woah, seriously? LM 3.1 is perfect for that. Anyway, I'll leave
this for you.
OK
Perhaps we should move
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:00:53PM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Graham Percival wrote Friday, July 31, 2009 10:50 AM
- AU is looking really lean once we kill AU 1 and 2, so this would
give that manual more of a reason to exist.
Not a *good* reason, though
:)
Besides, suggestions for
Graham Percival wrote Friday, July 31, 2009 12:47 PM
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:00:53PM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Graham Percival wrote Friday, July 31, 2009 10:50 AM
Besides, suggestions for writing files totally _sounds_ like
usage information to me. :)
Not sure about totally.
Trevor Daniels wrote Friday, July 31, 2009 3:32 PM
Graham Percival wrote Friday, July 31, 2009 12:47 PM
Ah, I'd forgotten about those. Yes, 5.1.4 and 5.1.5 would be
better off in LM 3. Or maybe LM 4, since they both discuss
tweaks.
OK. I'll move 5.1.4 and 5.1.5 out sometime in
the next
Hi Trevor,
Could you redistribute the material in LM 5.2 Scores and parts
elsewhere in the LM? Maybe beef up LM 2.4.1, maybe insert a new
LM 2.4.2 that continues the scores and parts theme, maybe
something in LM 3... whatever.
I leave it up to your judgement; I just want to start abolishing
LM
