On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 02:07:35PM -0800, Mark Polesky wrote:
> I'm intentionally making a big deal out of this because this
> is the text on page 2 of the manual, and disingenuous claims
> are off-putting to new users. We're trying to "sell" a
> product, but our pitch is unconvincing and maybe a l
Years ago I made a 4800dpi film in a printshop. It was surprisingly
different than a 600dpi laser-print.
So to make a fair comparison one should print pages with the same
professional technology and see.
Bert
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
On 12/14/08 11:45 PM, "Mark Polesky" wrote:
LM 1.1 Ba
On 12/14/08 11:45 PM, "Mark Polesky" wrote:
> LM 1.1 Background - "Engraving" states:
>
> "our staff lines... are also
> much thicker than lines in the
> computer edition."
>
> In both the HTML and PDF versions, LilyPond's staff lines are
> in fact the thinnest when compared. I've included a
LM 1.1 Background - "Engraving" states:
"our staff lines... are also
much thicker than lines in the
computer edition."
In both the HTML and PDF versions, LilyPond's staff lines are
in fact the thinnest when compared. I've included a png to
make this easier to see. In the HTML version, the dista
