Re: LSR lovers: walk the walk

2011-07-05 Thread Valentin Villenave
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > From a contributors point of view: If a snippet compiles with current stable, > fine, it can be used at LSR. However, if it doesn't compile with current > stable, I can't add it to the LSR now, so it probably won't get added to the > LSR

Re: LSR lovers: walk the walk

2011-07-03 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
Am Sonntag, 3. Juli 2011, 18:54:02 schrieb Graham Percival: > On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 06:46:22PM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > > Am Sonntag, 3. Juli 2011, 17:31:19 schrieb Graham Percival: > > > 1. we need to ask Sebastiano to upgrade LSR to 2.14.1. This may > > > require extra manual attenti

Re: LSR lovers: walk the walk

2011-07-03 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 06:46:22PM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > Am Sonntag, 3. Juli 2011, 17:31:19 schrieb Graham Percival: > > 1. we need to ask Sebastiano to upgrade LSR to 2.14.1. This may > > require extra manual attention to upgrade some snippets that > > convert-ly can't handle. > > A

Re: LSR lovers: walk the walk

2011-07-03 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
Am Sonntag, 3. Juli 2011, 17:31:19 schrieb Graham Percival: > 1. we need to ask Sebastiano to upgrade LSR to 2.14.1. This may > require extra manual attention to upgrade some snippets that > convert-ly can't handle. Actually, I have been thinking about implementing multiple-version support in LS

LSR lovers: walk the walk

2011-07-03 Thread Graham Percival
Ok, lots of people "talked the talk" about how much they love LSR. Now it's time to "walk the walk". 1. we need to ask Sebastiano to upgrade LSR to 2.14.1. This may require extra manual attention to upgrade some snippets that convert-ly can't handle. 2. we need to add everything in Documentati