On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer
wrote:
> From a contributors point of view: If a snippet compiles with current stable,
> fine, it can be used at LSR. However, if it doesn't compile with current
> stable, I can't add it to the LSR now, so it probably won't get added to the
> LSR
Am Sonntag, 3. Juli 2011, 18:54:02 schrieb Graham Percival:
> On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 06:46:22PM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 3. Juli 2011, 17:31:19 schrieb Graham Percival:
> > > 1. we need to ask Sebastiano to upgrade LSR to 2.14.1. This may
> > > require extra manual attenti
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 06:46:22PM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 3. Juli 2011, 17:31:19 schrieb Graham Percival:
> > 1. we need to ask Sebastiano to upgrade LSR to 2.14.1. This may
> > require extra manual attention to upgrade some snippets that
> > convert-ly can't handle.
>
> A
Am Sonntag, 3. Juli 2011, 17:31:19 schrieb Graham Percival:
> 1. we need to ask Sebastiano to upgrade LSR to 2.14.1. This may
> require extra manual attention to upgrade some snippets that
> convert-ly can't handle.
Actually, I have been thinking about implementing multiple-version support in
LS
Ok, lots of people "talked the talk" about how much they love LSR.
Now it's time to "walk the walk".
1. we need to ask Sebastiano to upgrade LSR to 2.14.1. This may
require extra manual attention to upgrade some snippets that
convert-ly can't handle.
2. we need to add everything in
Documentati