On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 11:50:07AM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
> I'd like to push
> this to staging, but would appreciate someone else (David, Graham?)
> looking at it just to check. I'd prefer not to go to a Rietveld for
> this simple change.
LGTM.
Cheers,
- Graham
__
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To:
Sent: Monday, January 02, 2012 11:56 AM
Subject: Re: LSR updates (again)
"Phil Holmes" writes:
OK - I'm having another go at getting the LSR updates into git.
Graham's recommended method for this (whi
On Jan 2, 2012, at 12:56 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> "Phil Holmes" writes:
>
>> OK - I'm having another go at getting the LSR updates into git.
>> Graham's recommended method for this (which I will add to the CG) is
>> to run makelsr locally, with no downloaded updates - this simply
>> aligns gi
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> OK - I'm having another go at getting the LSR updates into git.
> Graham's recommended method for this (which I will add to the CG) is
> to run makelsr locally, with no downloaded updates - this simply
> aligns git with any changes makelsr automatically makes. Attached is
OK - I'm having another go at getting the LSR updates into git. Graham's
recommended method for this (which I will add to the CG) is to run makelsr
locally, with no downloaded updates - this simply aligns git with any
changes makelsr automatically makes. Attached is a patch after this
process
