On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 12:53:55PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Graham Percival"
>
> >if you skim over the patch in gitk, you shouldn't see anything
> >weird. commit that and push directly to staging.
>
> Depends what counts as weird. I see lots of commitish c
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Devel"
Sent: Friday, November 25, 2011 7:10 PM
Subject: Re: LSR updates and Issue 1971
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 05:59:04PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
I've got a large patch that up
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 05:59:04PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
> I've got a large patch that updates the snippets from the LSR and
> fixes Issue 1971. It's a few hundred files. make and make doc are
> fine after adding it. Should I push to staging or do something like
> a review - it seems unlikel
On 11/25/11 11:46 AM, "Phil Holmes" wrote:
>- Original Message -
>From: "Carl Sorensen"
>To: "Phil Holmes" ; "Devel"
>Sent: Friday, November 25, 2011 6:35 PM
>Subject: Re: LSR updates and Issue 1971
>
>
>>
>>
&g
- Original Message -
From: "Carl Sorensen"
To: "Phil Holmes" ; "Devel"
Sent: Friday, November 25, 2011 6:35 PM
Subject: Re: LSR updates and Issue 1971
On 11/25/11 10:59 AM, "Phil Holmes" wrote:
I've got a large patch that updates t
On 11/25/11 10:59 AM, "Phil Holmes" wrote:
>I've got a large patch that updates the snippets from the LSR and fixes
>Issue 1971. It's a few hundred files. make and make doc are fine after
>adding it. Should I push to staging or do something like a review - it
>seems unlikely anyone will have
I've got a large patch that updates the snippets from the LSR and fixes
Issue 1971. It's a few hundred files. make and make doc are fine after
adding it. Should I push to staging or do something like a review - it
seems unlikely anyone will have the enthusiasm to review all 300-odd changed
f
