On 2020/02/21 08:21:07, lemzwerg wrote:
> > > could we check the version number instead?
> >
> > No, the header doesn't have version information.
>
> So we need both a recent flex program and a recent flex header, right?
For the
> former a version test would be easy, see
>
>
http://git.savannah
> > could we check the version number instead?
>
> No, the header doesn't have version information.
So we need both a recent flex program and a recent flex header, right?
For the former a version test would be easy, see
http://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/autoconf-archive.git/tree/m4/ax_prog_fl
https://codereview.appspot.com/563560043/diff/567260043/aclocal.m4
File aclocal.m4 (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/563560043/diff/567260043/aclocal.m4#newcode556
aclocal.m4:556: # check for yyFlexLexer.yypop_buffer_state () since flex
2.5.29
On 2020/02/20 23:05:46, hanwenn wrote:
> On 20
LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/563560043/diff/567260043/aclocal.m4
File aclocal.m4 (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/563560043/diff/567260043/aclocal.m4#newcode556
aclocal.m4:556: # check for yyFlexLexer.yypop_buffer_state () since flex
2.5.29
On 2020/02/20 14:21:08, hahnjo wrote:
>
Reviewers: ,
https://codereview.appspot.com/563560043/diff/567260043/aclocal.m4
File aclocal.m4 (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/563560043/diff/567260043/aclocal.m4#newcode556
aclocal.m4:556: # check for yyFlexLexer.yypop_buffer_state () since flex
2.5.29
Random thought: Do we want to che
