On 2017/10/24 08:34:13, thomasmorley651 wrote:
I tried to make both engravers as equal as I could, to make it easy
for a follow
up to create a common base class for both.
My own naive attempts to introduce something like 'semi-tie-event'
failed,
though.
This looks really similar. I worked
I tried to make both engravers as equal as I could, to make it easy for
a follow up to create a common base class for both.
My own naive attempts to introduce something like 'semi-tie-event'
failed, though.
https://codereview.appspot.com/335910043/
On 2017/10/22 20:01:03, dak wrote:
On 2017/10/22 19:26:12, benko.pal wrote:
> if it's really the same, can't it be used without copying? or if
separate
> classes are absolutely needed, can't the common part be gathered in
a common
> base class?
You mean, like with Slur/PhrasingSlur?
On 2017/10/22 19:26:12, benko.pal wrote:
if it's really the same, can't it be used without copying? or if
separate
classes are absolutely needed, can't the common part be gathered in a
common
base class?
You mean, like with Slur/PhrasingSlur? Well, for one thing, then
someone needs to
if it's really the same, can't it be used without copying? or if
separate classes are absolutely needed, can't the common part be
gathered in a common base class?
https://codereview.appspot.com/335910043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
Reviewers: ,
Message:
please review
Description:
Let repeatTie work inside of event-chord
The previous coding of repeat-tie-engraver.cc is replaced by the
renamed coding of the laissez-vibrer-engraver.
Please review this at https://codereview.appspot.com/335910043/
Affected files (+37, -21
