On 2016/03/13 23:39:29, thomasmorley651 wrote:
Even from description the consequences are not clear to me.
Can you give a little verbose example?
Basically, you can now use x.y for defining and \x.y for using a
variable like you could previously use x_y and \x_y but the value is
really stored
Reviewers: thomasmorley651, lemzwerg,
https://codereview.appspot.com/290560043/diff/1/lily/nested-property.cc
File lily/nested-property.cc (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/290560043/diff/1/lily/nested-property.cc#newcode137
lily/nested-property.cc:137: for (;scm_is_pair (prop_path);
LGTM.
https://codereview.appspot.com/290560043/diff/1/lily/nested-property.cc
File lily/nested-property.cc (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/290560043/diff/1/lily/nested-property.cc#newcode137
lily/nested-property.cc:137: for (;scm_is_pair (prop_path); prop_path =
scm_cdr (prop_path))
Even from description the consequences are not clear to me.
Can you give a little verbose example?
https://codereview.appspot.com/290560043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
