On Mar 24, 2011, at 10:46 AM, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 24. März 2011, 15:07:54 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys:
>> I think it would be awesome to have MusicXML output, but I am not sure
>> about the technical constraints. IIRC, MusicXML has a complicated way
>> of mixing layout and abs
Am Donnerstag, 24. März 2011, 15:07:54 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys:
> I think it would be awesome to have MusicXML output, but I am not sure
> about the technical constraints. IIRC, MusicXML has a complicated way
> of mixing layout and abstract music information, that would make it
> difficult to pro
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:11 AM, m...@apollinemike.com
wrote:
> Hey all,
> One of my goals for 2011 is to improve LilyPond's accessibility for the
> blind.
> I got this response from Haipeng (who currently has to rely on LilyPond's
> playback to catch errors) and I get the sense that the best op
On 3/24/11 7:11 AM, "m...@apollinemike.com" wrote:
>
> I got this response from Haipeng (who currently has to rely on LilyPond's
> playback to catch errors) and I get the sense that the best option would be
> creating a primitive form of lily -> musicxml conversion. Even if this cannot
> encap
Begin forwarded message:
> From: 胡海鹏 - Hu Haipeng
> Date: March 24, 2011 8:36:47 AM EDT
> To: "m...@apollinemike.com"
> Subject: Re:Re: LilyPond and visually impaired accessibility
>
> Ah, if it's possible, just do a musicxml backend. Because braille music is
