Re: Optimize get_path_list. (issue 579570043 by hanw...@gmail.com)

On 2020/04/13 19:11:22, hanwenn wrote: > https://codereview.appspot.com/579570043/diff/577750045/lily/stencil-integral.cc > File lily/stencil-integral.cc (right): > > https://codereview.appspot.com/579570043/diff/577750045/lily/stencil-integral.cc#newcode115 > lily/stencil-integral.cc:115: &&

Re: Optimize get_path_list. (issue 579570043 by hanw...@gmail.com)

https://codereview.appspot.com/579570043/diff/577750045/lily/stencil-integral.cc File lily/stencil-integral.cc (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/579570043/diff/577750045/lily/stencil-integral.cc#newcode115 lily/stencil-integral.cc:115: && (SCM_EQ_P (head, ly_symbol2scm ("moveto")) On

Optimize get_path_list. (issue 579570043 by hanw...@gmail.com)

There is scm_c_memq for avoiding hare, but for this use case, the explicit code seems like the saner option. Even without hare, the list would be consed together each time without further measures. https://codereview.appspot.com/579570043/diff/577750045/lily/stencil-integral.cc File