https://codereview.appspot.com/304200043/diff/20001/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely
File Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/304200043/diff/20001/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely#newcode3436
Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely:3436: the length
LGTM.
https://codereview.appspot.com/304200043/diff/20001/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely
File Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/304200043/diff/20001/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely#newcode3436
Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely:3436: the
On 2016/07/22 07:55:54, dak wrote:
On 2016/07/22 07:41:00, http://mark_opus11.net wrote:
> On 2016/07/22 04:26:01, lemzwerg wrote:
> > LGMT. Thanks a lot!
>
> Might it be a good idea to keep one example using the old define
method, which
> is still more convenient for setting the value for
Reviewers: lemzwerg, mark_opus11.net,
Message:
On 2016/07/22 07:41:00, mark_opus11.net wrote:
On 2016/07/22 04:26:01, lemzwerg wrote:
> LGMT. Thanks a lot!
Might it be a good idea to keep one example using the old define
method, which
is still more convenient for setting the value for
On 2016/07/22 04:26:01, lemzwerg wrote:
LGMT. Thanks a lot!
Might it be a good idea to keep one example using the old define method,
which is still more convenient for setting the value for multiple usages
of \afterGrace (or globally)?
https://codereview.appspot.com/304200043/
LGMT. Thanks a lot!
https://codereview.appspot.com/304200043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
