On Jun 6, 2020, at 16:03, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 06.06.2020, 15:47 -0400 schrieb Dan Eble:
>> On Jun 6, 2020, at 15:26, Dan Eble wrote:
>>> split the doc stage of the build into multiple stages that can be run in
>>> parallel on different runners
>>
>> For example, assigning ea
Dan Eble writes:
> Would we still be validating LilyPond properly if we split the doc
> stage of the build into multiple stages that can be run in parallel on
> different runners, or is it fundamentally important that we test "make
> doc"?
Well, given the current frequency of build system change
Am Samstag, den 06.06.2020, 15:47 -0400 schrieb Dan Eble:
> On Jun 6, 2020, at 15:26, Dan Eble wrote:
> > split the doc stage of the build into multiple stages that can be run in
> > parallel on different runners
>
> For example, assigning each runner one or more languages to build.
In my under
On Jun 6, 2020, at 15:26, Dan Eble wrote:
>
> split the doc stage of the build into multiple stages that can be run in
> parallel on different runners
For example, assigning each runner one or more languages to build.
—
Dan
Would we still be validating LilyPond properly if we split the doc stage of the
build into multiple stages that can be run in parallel on different runners, or
is it fundamentally important that we test "make doc"?
—
Dan
