Did something change in the past couple of weeks to make "Parsed object should
be dead" messages more likely? Now that I've turned from documentation back to
development, they seem to be getting in my way much more than they used to.
This stan
Hey all,
I've been getting this from LilyPond recently:
programming error: Parsed object should be dead: static scm_unused_struct*
Prob::mark_smob(scm_unused_struct*)
continuing, cross fingers
Is anyone else getting this too?
Cheer
I'm getting a lot of:
programming error: Parsed object should be dead: static scm_unused_struct*
Prob::mark_smob(scm_unused_struct*)
continuing, cross fingers
from current master. Is anyone else having this problem?
Cheers,
MS
___
lilypond-
Am Samstag, dem 06.02.2021 um 13:33 -0500 schrieb Dan Eble:
> Did something change in the past couple of weeks to make "Parsed
> object should be dead" messages more likely? Now that I've turned
> from documentation back to development, they seem to be getting in my
> w
On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 7:33 PM Dan Eble wrote:
> Did something change in the past couple of weeks to make "Parsed object
> should be dead" messages more likely? Now that I've turned from
> documentation back to development, they seem to be getting in my way much
Am Sonntag, dem 07.02.2021 um 23:16 +0100 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys:
> On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 7:33 PM Dan Eble wrote:
>
> > Did something change in the past couple of weeks to make "Parsed object
> > should be dead" messages more likely? Now that I've turn
> I've been getting this from LilyPond recently:
>
> programming error: Parsed object should be dead: static scm_unused_struct*
> Prob::mark_smob(scm_unused_struct*)
> continuing, cross fingers
>
> Is anyone else getting this too?
I'm getting this all the
On May 31, 2011, at 6:23 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>> I've been getting this from LilyPond recently:
>>
>> programming error: Parsed object should be dead: static scm_unused_struct*
>> Prob::mark_smob(scm_unused_struct*)
>> continuing, cross fingers
>
Hi Mike,
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 4:08 PM, m...@apollinemike.com
wrote:
>
> I've been getting this from LilyPond recently:
>
> programming error: Parsed object should be dead: static scm_unused_struct*
> Prob::mark_smob(scm_unused_struct*)
> continuing, cross fingers
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 8:08 PM, m...@apollinemike.com
wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I've been getting this from LilyPond recently:
>
> programming error: Parsed object should be dead: static scm_unused_struct*
> Prob::mark_smob(scm_unused_struct*)
> continuing, cross fingers
"m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
> I'm getting a lot of:
>
> programming error: Parsed object should be dead: static
> scm_unused_struct* Prob::mark_smob(scm_unused_struct*)
> continuing, cross fingers
>
> from current master. Is anyone else having this pr
David Kastrup writes:
> "m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
>
>> I'm getting a lot of:
>>
>> programming error: Parsed object should be dead: static
>> scm_unused_struct* Prob::mark_smob(scm_unused_struct*)
>> continuing, cross fingers
>>
&g
"m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
> I'm getting a lot of:
>
> programming error: Parsed object should be dead: static
> scm_unused_struct* Prob::mark_smob(scm_unused_struct*)
> continuing, cross fingers
>
> from current master. Is anyone else having thi
Does anyone else see a lot of “Parsed object should be dead” programming errors
in the regression test logs?
—
Dan
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 26/10/14 02:49, Dan Eble wrote:
> Does anyone else see a lot of “Parsed object should be dead” programming
> errors in the regression test logs?
> —
> Dan
As another example:
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4156
See comment #5 onwards.
I think you're
Dan Eble writes:
> Does anyone else see a lot of “Parsed object should be dead”
> programming errors in the regression test logs?
They occur sometimes. If they are a regular, they might point to a
problem.
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond
On Oct 26, 2014, at 08:35 , David Kastrup wrote:
> Dan Eble writes:
>
>> Does anyone else see a lot of “Parsed object should be dead”
>> programming errors in the regression test logs?
>
> They occur sometimes. If they are a regular, they might point to a
> problem.
>>> Does anyone else see a lot of “Parsed object should be dead”
>>> programming errors in the regression test logs?
>>
>> They occur sometimes. If they are a regular, they might point to a
>> problem.
>
> OK, thanks. The reason I noticed them is that
Werner LEMBERG writes:
>>>> Does anyone else see a lot of “Parsed object should be dead”
>>>> programming errors in the regression test logs?
>>>
>>> They occur sometimes. If they are a regular, they might point to a
>>> problem.
>>
&g
LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/258030043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
20 matches
Mail list logo
