On 26/10/14 02:49, Dan Eble wrote:
Does anyone else see a lot of “Parsed object should be dead” programming
errors in the regression test logs?
—
Dan
As another example:
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4156
See comment #5 onwards.
I think you're hitting the kind of
Dan Eble d...@faithful.be writes:
Does anyone else see a lot of “Parsed object should be dead”
programming errors in the regression test logs?
They occur sometimes. If they are a regular, they might point to a
problem.
--
David Kastrup
___
On Oct 26, 2014, at 08:35 , David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Dan Eble d...@faithful.be writes:
Does anyone else see a lot of “Parsed object should be dead”
programming errors in the regression test logs?
They occur sometimes. If they are a regular, they might point to a
problem.
OK,
Does anyone else see a lot of “Parsed object should be dead”
programming errors in the regression test logs?
They occur sometimes. If they are a regular, they might point to a
problem.
OK, thanks. The reason I noticed them is that they were not regular.
For the record, I never saw them
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes:
Does anyone else see a lot of “Parsed object should be dead”
programming errors in the regression test logs?
They occur sometimes. If they are a regular, they might point to a
problem.
OK, thanks. The reason I noticed them is that they were not
Does anyone else see a lot of “Parsed object should be dead” programming errors
in the regression test logs?
—
Dan
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
