On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 09:34:34PM +0100, Neil Puttock wrote:
2009/7/13 Maximilian Albert maximilian.alb...@googlemail.com:
Thanks a lot! So does this close issue 685?
Yes.
Not until somebody changes the status! Remember, whenever you
push a fix to master, alter the status on the
2009/7/13 Maximilian Albert maximilian.alb...@googlemail.com:
Thanks a lot! So does this close issue 685?
Yes.
What's the status about
.log files being created on Windows mentioned there?
Assuming this is a feature Windows users would like, it should be
logged as a new issue (low priority
Neil Puttock wrote Tuesday, July 14, 2009 9:34 PM
2009/7/13 Maximilian Albert maximilian.alb...@googlemail.com:
Thanks a lot! So does this close issue 685?
Yes.
What's the status about
.log files being created on Windows mentioned there?
Assuming this is a feature Windows users would
2009/7/10 Maximilian Albert maximilian.alb...@googlemail.com:
OK, thanks. Now the docs compiled fine and I could check that the
result of my patch is as intended. Any further comments or are they
ready to be applied?
Thanks, they're both applied.
Regards,
Neil
2009/7/13 Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com:
Thanks, they're both applied.
Thanks a lot! So does this close issue 685? What's the status about
.log files being created on Windows mentioned there?
Max
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
2009/7/10 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
I've just got the same error. It's caused by Graham's essay makefile
hacking.
Sorry, I'll branch a dev/graham and then revert it.
OK, thanks. Now the docs compiled fine and I could check that the
result of my patch is as intended. Any
2009/7/9 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
Yes, that patch is the only thing needed to fix it. However, does
this patch apply cleanly, without disrupting any regtests?
Hmm, I tried to run the regression tests via 'make check' (is that the
right way to do it?) with the current git
2009/7/9 Maximilian Albert maximilian.alb...@googlemail.com
Hmm, I tried to run the regression tests via 'make check' (is that the
right way to do it?)
No, see Testing LilyPond in the Contrib Guide or in Application
usage, section Install/build from source/compile (don't remember the
exact
:49 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] Delete intermediate ps files by default
---
scm/lily.scm |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scm/lily.scm b/scm/lily.scm
index 270ed42..53dd685 100644
--- a/scm/lily.scm
+++ b/scm/lily.scm
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ configurations.)
Debug
2009/7/9 Maximilian Albert maximilian.alb...@googlemail.com:
I performed the instructions given there and got three differences reported
(one of which is in the file
Addendum: After re-running the tests with the additional NEWS entry,
there are only two differences, one of which is
2009/7/9 Maximilian Albert maximilian.alb...@googlemail.com:
'make doc' (which I initially thought generates the
documentation) produces an error
Which error? If you can't fix it yourself, please report, including
the last 100 lines of make output and other log files as appropriate.
and
2009/7/10 John Mandereau john.mander...@gmail.com:
2009/7/9 Maximilian Albert maximilian.alb...@googlemail.com:
'make doc' (which I initially thought generates the
documentation) produces an error
Which error? If you can't fix it yourself, please report, including
the last 100 lines of make
2009/7/9 Maximilian Albert maximilian.alb...@googlemail.com:
You can find them here, along with the error message (at the bottom):
http://pastebin.com/m2bcb5c37
I've just got the same error. It's caused by Graham's essay makefile hacking.
Unfortunately I don't know how to fix it apart from
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 08:01:46PM +0100, Neil Puttock wrote:
2009/7/9 Maximilian Albert maximilian.alb...@googlemail.com:
You can find them here, along with the error message (at the bottom):
http://pastebin.com/m2bcb5c37
I've just got the same error. It's caused by Graham's essay
Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maximilian Albert maximilian.alb...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:55:49 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] Delete intermediate ps files by default
---
scm/lily.scm |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scm/lily.scm b/scm/lily.scm
to be the case with the
latest version 2.13.4.
Cheers,
Max
From e7c2bc32829c1e6a9197c893497019a7b2904ded Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maximilian Albert maximilian.alb...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:55:49 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] Delete intermediate ps files by default
---
scm/lily.scm |2 +-
1
16 matches
Mail list logo