Re: Patch: tie-ing enharmonic variants

2005-02-03 Thread Arno Waschk
But it does happen in polyphonic piano music, very often to notate one hand silently taking over the note form the other hand. Arno On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 17:59:14 +0200, Yuval Harel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 09:34:55 +0100, Kilian A. Foth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Han-Wen N

Re: Patch: tie-ing enharmonic variants

2005-02-02 Thread Kilian A. Foth
Mats Bengtsson writes: > For tie directions, take a look at the list of predefined commands at > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.4/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Ties.html#Ties > I think you can guess from the name, which command to use to direct it > upwards or downwards, respectively. > Th

Re: Patch: tie-ing enharmonic variants

2005-02-01 Thread Yuval Harel
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 09:34:55 +0100, Kilian A. Foth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > [...] > > > > This changes tie-ing behaviour so that not the exact pitch property > > of two candidate notes is compared, but the normalized chromatic > > pit

Re: Patch: tie-ing enharmonic variants

2005-02-01 Thread Mats Bengtsson
For tie directions, take a look at the list of predefined commands at http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.4/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Ties.html#Ties I think you can guess from the name, which command to use to direct it upwards or downwards, respectively. /Mats Kilian A. Foth wrote: Han-Wen Nie

Re: Patch: tie-ing enharmonic variants

2005-02-01 Thread Kilian A. Foth
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > [...] > > > > This changes tie-ing behaviour so that not the exact pitch property > > of two candidate notes is compared, but the normalized chromatic > > pitch. (The old behaviour can, of course, be produced by not using > > ~ in the

Re: Patch: tie-ing enharmonic variants

2005-01-31 Thread Michael Welsh Duggan
Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Kilian A. Foth wrote: > >>Paul Scott writes: >> > Kilian A. Foth wrote: >> > > >Greetings, >> > > >> > >a while back I asked lilypond-user how to engrave a tie between >> > >enharmonic variants, such as g sharp in one bar and a flat in the next >> > >after

Re: Patch: tie-ing enharmonic variants

2005-01-31 Thread Kilian A. Foth
Paul Scott writes: > Kilian A. Foth wrote: > > >Greetings, > > > >a while back I asked lilypond-user how to engrave a tie between > >enharmonic variants, such as g sharp in one bar and a flat in the next > >after a key change. The reponse was that not only does lilypond not do > >this, but

Re: Patch: tie-ing enharmonic variants

2005-01-31 Thread Paul Scott
Kilian A. Foth wrote: Paul Scott writes: > Kilian A. Foth wrote: > > >Greetings, > > > >a while back I asked lilypond-user how to engrave a tie between > >enharmonic variants, such as g sharp in one bar and a flat in the next > >after a key change. The reponse was that not only does lilypond not d

Patch: tie-ing enharmonic variants

2005-01-31 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Greetings, > > a while back I asked lilypond-user how to engrave a tie between > enharmonic variants, such as g sharp in one bar and a flat in the next > after a key change. The reponse was that not only does lilypond not do > this, but you cannot even typeset the ti

Re: Patch: tie-ing enharmonic variants

2005-01-31 Thread Paul Scott
Kilian A. Foth wrote: Greetings, a while back I asked lilypond-user how to engrave a tie between enharmonic variants, such as g sharp in one bar and a flat in the next after a key change. The reponse was that not only does lilypond not do this, but you cannot even typeset the tie manually by \overr

Patch: tie-ing enharmonic variants

2005-01-31 Thread Kilian A. Foth
Greetings, a while back I asked lilypond-user how to engrave a tie between enharmonic variants, such as g sharp in one bar and a flat in the next after a key change. The reponse was that not only does lilypond not do this, but you cannot even typeset the tie manually by \overriding something. I w