On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
I believe the highest bounty so far was 250 euro, back in the days
when Han-Wen was working full-time and Trevor Baca was requesting many
new features.
FTR -- The highest bounty I ever paid was 500 euros, in 2007.
On 06/09/2010 10:52 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
Uh, am I by now in everybody's killfile
I do not know why you keep saying these things, but to avoid any
misunderstanding I must publicly state that David is in the top
half-dozen on *my* list of most respected LilyPond people.
On 06/13/2010
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Boris Shingarov b...@shingarov.com wrote:
On 06/09/2010 10:52 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
Uh, am I by now in everybody's killfile
I do not know why you keep saying these things, but to avoid any
misunderstanding I must publicly state that David is in the top
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Boris Shingarov b...@shingarov.com wrote:
This is not what we are saying in our presentation and/or paper.
What we are saying is: We attempted a publication of a major critical
edition through a major publishing house, using software from a volunteer
Op dinsdag 15-06-2010 om 16:50 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Graham
Percival:
I really cannot recall seeing any offers of thousands of Euros. If
they're still valid offers, please send info to bug-lilypond.
That has been attempted before... hmm, 2007? Han-Wen tried to work on
lilypond
Hi Graham and all Lilyponders,
I was quite astonished to hear that my slides were understood to mean
anything pessimistic or negative. If they give people this impression,
then it is a defect of the slides which I will fix.
But right now, let me address some of the apparent
On 13 June 2010 07:02, Boris Shingarov b...@shingarov.com wrote:
Your post is absolutely unnecessary
http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-u...@gnu.org/msg52334.html
That comment wasn't directed at Jiříi; it was part of a reply to David Kastrup.
Regards,
Neil
Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com writes:
On 13 June 2010 07:02, Boris Shingarov b...@shingarov.com wrote:
Your post is absolutely unnecessary
http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-u...@gnu.org/msg52334.html
That comment wasn't directed at Jiříi; it was part of a reply to David
Kastrup.
And
Le 13 juin 2010 à 15:22, David Kastrup a écrit :
If the worst Boris can come up with with regard to developer attitudes
are misconstrued postings of mine (heck, I'd think I can be enough of a
problem without reverting to such tactics) or replies to them, the
situation cannot be all that bad.
Am Sonntag, 13. Juni 2010, um 16:55:01 schrieben Sie:
May I suggest that Publisher-Grade is perhaps a misnomer? This makes it
sound like we can't produce *any* publisher-grade music without footnotes,
or endnotes, or widow/orphan control. Perhaps an adjustment to the title
to Publisher-Grade
On 6/13/10 9:17 AM, Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com wrote:
If there are other patches that are not yet up to
LilyPond status, but might be able to get there, it would be nice to have
them listed as issues with patches attached.
I suppose a starting point could be to look at
11 matches
Mail list logo
