Graham Percival wrote Tuesday, March 02, 2010 9:30 AM
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 09:25:55AM -, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Following Francisco's "correction" my local check
on reference validity now says
Warning: xref should be internal around line 231 in
included/compile.itexi
Warning: xref
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 09:25:55AM -, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> Mark Polesky wrote Tuesday, March 02, 2010 1:18 AM
>
>> I just successfully compiled commit 715dc5e, which contains
>> the @ref being discussed.
Did that also regenerate the topdocs? If not, then you wouldn't
see the error Franci
Mark Polesky wrote Tuesday, March 02, 2010 1:18 AM
Francisco Vila wrote:
Compile stopped there, then I removed the @ref and compile
succeeded; I even added a warning following Graham. An
extra point is: nobody told she could compile the docs
without the remove.
I just successfully compiled
Francisco Vila wrote:
> Compile stopped there, then I removed the @ref and compile
> succeeded; I even added a warning following Graham. An
> extra point is: nobody told she could compile the docs
> without the remove.
I just successfully compiled commit 715dc5e, which contains
the @ref being dis
Francisco Vila wrote Monday, March 01, 2010 11:29 PM
2010/3/1 Mark Polesky :
Graham Percival wrote:
It should be @rcontrib. We can't use @ref inside
included/
Then why don't the 8 remaining instances of @ref (in
compile.itexi) prevent the docs from compiling?
I am sorry for not to have l
2010/3/1 Mark Polesky :
> Graham Percival wrote:
>> It should be @rcontrib. We can't use @ref inside
>> included/
>
> Then why don't the 8 remaining instances of @ref (in
> compile.itexi) prevent the docs from compiling?
I am sorry for not to have looked for the origin of the problem in depth;
C
Graham Percival wrote:
> It should be @rcontrib. We can't use @ref inside
> included/
Then why don't the 8 remaining instances of @ref (in
compile.itexi) prevent the docs from compiling?
$ git grep -h -n '@ref' Documentation/included/compile.itexi
43:program. For more information, see @ref{Bui
2010/3/1 Graham Percival :
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 08:23:17PM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote:
>> Hello. Until I edited the following, I couldn't be able to compile the
>> docs, showing always a broken reference error. The target does exist,
>> but it seems it can not be that easily referenced from
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 08:23:17PM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote:
> Hello. Until I edited the following, I couldn't be able to compile the
> docs, showing always a broken reference error. The target does exist,
> but it seems it can not be that easily referenced from an included
> file.
> Is anybody
Hello. Until I edited the following, I couldn't be able to compile the
docs, showing always a broken reference error. The target does exist,
but it seems it can not be that easily referenced from an included
file.
Is anybody of you able to compile the doc without a similar fix? Thanks.
diff --git
10 matches
Mail list logo
