Am 20.03.2013 02:16, schrieb David Kastrup:
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca writes:
Hi Shane,
What happens when we need an awkward length R like R1*12/8*14?
I'm not sure what you mean by awkward length…
I'm suggesting that R (with no duration given) should give you a
Jan-Peter Voigt jp.vo...@gmx.de writes:
[...]
(ly:make-duration (inexact-exact (/ (log den)(log 2))) ...
That's a terribly broken thing to do. inexact-exact does not change
the value one bit, only its interpretation. A number considered to be
_approximated_ by integer*2^power is now
Am 20.03.2013 09:55, schrieb David Kastrup:
Jan-Peter Voigt jp.vo...@gmx.de writes:
[...]
(ly:make-duration (inexact-exact (/ (log den)(log 2))) ...
That's a terribly broken thing to do. inexact-exact does not change
the value one bit, only its interpretation. A number considered to
Hello all,
While answering Helge's post about multi-measure rests, I had a couple of
R-elated observations/thoughts:
1. We shouldn't be encouraging code like R4*3 in a 4/4 measure, right? So the
duration ultimately makes no sense anyway.
2. The most elegant solution would be to use R (i.e.,
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca writes:
Hello all,
While answering Helge's post about multi-measure rests, I had a couple
of R-elated observations/thoughts:
1. We shouldn't be encouraging code like R4*3 in a 4/4 measure, right?
So the duration ultimately makes no sense
Am 19.03.2013 20:41, schrieb David Kastrup:
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca writes:
Hello all,
While answering Helge's post about multi-measure rests, I had a couple
of R-elated observations/thoughts:
1. We shouldn't be encouraging code like R4*3 in a 4/4 measure, right?
So
Kieren,
What happens when we need an awkward length R like R1*12/8*14?
Shane
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Kieren MacMillan
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
Hello all,
While answering Helge's post about multi-measure rests, I had a couple of
R-elated observations/thoughts:
1. We
Hi Shane,
What happens when we need an awkward length R like R1*12/8*14?
I'm not sure what you mean by awkward length…
I'm suggesting that R (with no duration given) should give you a one-measure
multi-measure rest, regardless of what the measure duration is.
And that Rx (where x is an
Even while I am a bit sceptical whether the syntax for R should differ
from r, I see your point.
Rather than R14 for a 14 measure rest, I would suggest to keep the
syntax close to the one before: R*14 (This way I would almost be
convinced ;) )
Could the duration be optional this way, keeping the
I see now, but one would think that might cause more difficult
programming necessitating the keeping tracking of various R values
through out the piece as defined by a time signature as opposed to us
setting the value, which probably would also slow down lilypond having
to parse and hang on to
Hi Shane,
one would think that might cause more difficult
programming necessitating the keeping tracking of various R values
through out the piece as defined by a time signature as opposed to us
setting the value, which probably would also slow down lilypond having
to parse and hang on to
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 19:38:10 -0400
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
Hi Shane,
one would think that might cause more difficult
programming necessitating the keeping tracking of various R values
through out the piece as defined by a time signature as opposed to us
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca writes:
Hi Shane,
What happens when we need an awkward length R like R1*12/8*14?
I'm not sure what you mean by awkward length…
I'm suggesting that R (with no duration given) should give you a
one-measure multi-measure rest, regardless of
13 matches
Mail list logo
