org
> Onderwerp: Re: Another patch
>
> On May 10, 2020, at 08:11, lilyp...@de-wolff.org wrote:
> >
> > I did replace all implicit casts to an int by a inline function,
> > checking if the value is valid, and then casting to int.
> >
> > Together with m
On May 10, 2020, at 08:11, lilyp...@de-wolff.org wrote:
>
> I did replace all implicit casts to an int by a inline function, checking if
> the value is valid, and then casting to int.
>
> Together with my previous patch now all but one compiler warnings are
> solved.
Jaap,
I love the fact that
> "Juergen" == Juergen Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> except I find it harder to read. What do you think is the
>> advantage of yours over mine?
>>
Juergen> Your approach
>> a = re.sub ( '-', '- ', a)# split words with -
Juergen> applies a rule which
On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, Laura Conrad wrote:
I just tested it and in actual code, yours seems to do the same thing
mine does,
N.B.: There should be a minor difference in the handling of white space
before/after the hyphen, which however is not essential, I guess.
except I find it harder to read
> "Juergen" == Juergen Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> a = re.sub ( '-', '- ', a)# split words with -
>> +a = re.sub ( ' - - ', ' -- ', a) # unless was originally " -- "
Juergen> Just being curious:
Juergen> Maybe I am totally wrong (since I do not know the
a = re.sub ( '-', '- ', a)# split words with -
+a = re.sub ( ' - - ', ' -- ', a) # unless was originally " -- "
Just being curious:
Maybe I am totally wrong (since I do not know the abc format in detail),
but shouldn't this be rather something like
a = re.sub ( '([^-])-([^-
> Here is another patch. This one also changes the defaults
> for LilyPond-command-master: it makes sure that a command
> doesn't get run needlessly, by checking the filestamps
> (of the buffer and the master file).
>
> Greetings,
Applied. Thanks.
BTW, should that lilypond