the big difference came out of the notes.clean() (???) line!
yours, Arno
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 01:02:07 +0200, Joe Neeman wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Arno Waschk wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 21:21:28 +0200, Joe Neeman
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Arno Waschk wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Arno Waschk wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 21:21:28 +0200, Joe Neeman
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Arno Waschk wrote:
>>
>>
>>> seems this is something which is new (i tried as well 2.13.26).
>>> it just meens that the swap partition is full...
>
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 21:21:28 +0200, Joe Neeman wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Arno Waschk wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 13:27:53 +0200, Arno Waschk
wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 01:53:21 +0200, Joe Neeman
wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Neil Puttock
wrote:
Hi Joe,
O
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Arno Waschk wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 13:27:53 +0200, Arno Waschk wrote:
>
> On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 01:53:21 +0200, Joe Neeman
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Neil Puttock
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Joe,
On 13 July 2010 02:18, Joe Neema
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 13:27:53 +0200, Arno Waschk wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 01:53:21 +0200, Joe Neeman
wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Neil Puttock
wrote:
Hi Joe,
On 13 July 2010 02:18, Joe Neeman wrote:
> Does the attached patch help? For me, it reduces dramatically the
> n
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 01:53:21 +0200, Joe Neeman wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Neil Puttock
wrote:
Hi Joe,
On 13 July 2010 02:18, Joe Neeman wrote:
> Does the attached patch help? For me, it reduces dramatically the
> number of times that combine_pure_heights (and also ly_scm2in
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Neil Puttock wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> On 13 July 2010 02:18, Joe Neeman wrote:
>
> > Does the attached patch help? For me, it reduces dramatically the
> > number of times that combine_pure_heights (and also ly_scm2interval)
> > is called, but it has very little effec
Hi Joe,
On 13 July 2010 02:18, Joe Neeman wrote:
> Does the attached patch help? For me, it reduces dramatically the
> number of times that combine_pure_heights (and also ly_scm2interval)
> is called, but it has very little effect on lilypond's overall running
> time (for the optimized build, at
> Hi, the mentioned routine is called ~ 23 times and does hardly consume
> time according to gprof.
> it is a cello and piano score with quite lot systems squeezed onto the a3
> pages. it contains ~ 1600 bars, and breaks.size() is around 1200 IIRC
Does the attached patch help? For me, it reduc
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 22:23:04 +0200, Joe Neeman wrote:
On Monday, July 12, 2010 06:51:15 am Arno Waschk wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 15:02:26 +0200, Carl Sorensen
wrote:
> On 7/12/10 4:48 AM, "Arno Waschk" wrote:
>>> Just finished a profile run with a larger score- ly_scm2interval is
>>> repor
On Monday, July 12, 2010 06:51:15 am Arno Waschk wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 15:02:26 +0200, Carl Sorensen
>
> wrote:
> > On 7/12/10 4:48 AM, "Arno Waschk" wrote:
> >>> Just finished a profile run with a larger score- ly_scm2interval is
> >>> reported to have consumd 16% of computation time. Th
Arno,
I think you're doing a great job of tracking this issue down!
Keep up the good work,
Carl
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 15:02:26 +0200, Carl Sorensen
wrote:
On 7/12/10 4:48 AM, "Arno Waschk" wrote:
Just finished a profile run with a larger score- ly_scm2interval is
reported to have consumd 16% of computation time. There must be
something wrong.
... which appears in a loop, which i
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 15:02:26 +0200, Carl Sorensen
wrote:
On 7/12/10 4:48 AM, "Arno Waschk" wrote:
Just finished a profile run with a larger score- ly_scm2interval is
reported to have consumd 16% of computation time. There must be
something wrong.
... which appears in a loop, which i
On 7/12/10 4:48 AM, "Arno Waschk" wrote:
>>
>> Just finished a profile run with a larger score- ly_scm2interval is
>> reported to have consumd 16% of computation time. There must be
>> something wrong.
>>
>
> ... which appears in a loop, which is performed >2 billions times (!) for
> a 18 a
Just finished a profile run with a larger score- ly_scm2interval is
reported to have consumd 16% of computation time. There must be
something wrong.
... which appears in a loop, which is performed >2 billions times (!) for
a 18 a3 page test score.
Says gprof...
Is that possible/necess
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Arno Waschk wrote:
>>> SCM proc = ly_lily_module_constant ("map-alist-keys");
>>>
>>> Call the procedure, using scm_call_2:
>>>
>>> SCM result = scm_call_2 (proc, arg1, arg2);
>>>
>
> okay, what are arg1 and arg2, and what is the type of result beyond being
> call
On 07/11/2010 07:22 PM, Arno Waschk wrote:
Thanks again, that wokrs at least for some displaying, buit still i
need that handy conversion from this type of scheme list into
something i can deal with with c.
Please!!!
No, no, the main question is, what are you going to do with that
"something
On 07/11/2010 06:47 PM, Arno Waschk wrote:
okay, what are arg1 and arg2, and what is the type of result beyond
being called "SCM"?
An ID for a Scheme entity. This is a fundamental concept in languages
such as Scheme, Smalltalk, Self of Java. The value of the SCM itself is
completely opaque
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 01:11:40 +0200, Neil Puttock
wrote:
On 11 July 2010 23:08, Arno Waschk wrote:
Anyway, i came to a point where it seems very helpful to provide an easy
option to print somehow the actual content of e. g. a grob at a certain
point in the c++ code, or easily do some other
On 11 July 2010 23:08, Arno Waschk wrote:
> Anyway, i came to a point where it seems very helpful to provide an easy
> option to print somehow the actual content of e. g. a grob at a certain
> point in the c++ code, or easily do some other voodoo to it, which i do not
> know yet...
If you use th
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 00:08:02 +0200, Arno Waschk wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 20:08:10 +0200, Neil Puttock
wrote:
On 11 July 2010 15:52, Arno Waschk wrote:
How do i use this in a c line?
Look up the procedure:
SCM proc = ly_lily_module_constant ("map-alist-keys");
Call the procedure, u
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 20:08:10 +0200, Neil Puttock
wrote:
On 11 July 2010 15:52, Arno Waschk wrote:
How do i use this in a c line?
Look up the procedure:
SCM proc = ly_lily_module_constant ("map-alist-keys");
Call the procedure, using scm_call_2:
SCM result = scm_call_2 (proc, arg1, arg
On 11 July 2010 15:52, Arno Waschk wrote:
> How do i use this in a c line?
Look up the procedure:
SCM proc = ly_lily_module_constant ("map-alist-keys");
Call the procedure, using scm_call_2:
SCM result = scm_call_2 (proc, arg1, arg2);
>> Your question isn't really about converting from schem
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 16:35:07 +0200, Carl Sorensen
wrote:
On 7/11/10 8:18 AM, "Arno Waschk" wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 16:01:52 +0200, Carl Sorensen
wrote:
On 7/11/10 7:53 AM, "Arno Waschk" wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 15:48:57 +0200, Carl Sorensen
wrote:
On 7/11/10 7:16 AM, "A
On 7/11/10 7:16 AM, "Arno Waschk" wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> in the hope not for the x-th time having to give up due to that type mess
> scheme/c++ please forgive and help me:
>
> how can i convert/process/whatever the result of
> whateverGrob->get_property_alist_chain (SCM_EOL) into something eas
26 matches
Mail list logo
