Graham Percival writes:
Almost everybody wants stable releases more frequently. They
attract positive attention
Are you sure? On what fora was the 2.14 release announced? Did it
eventually make lwn.net? Has anyone checked how many followers we have
on FB or Twitter (MuseScore, anyone?).
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:55:04AM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Graham Percival writes:
Almost everybody wants stable releases more frequently. They
attract positive attention
Are you sure?
It attracted positive attention on lilypond-user. I never said
*how* much attention it
Graham Percival writes:
It attracted positive attention on lilypond-user. I never said
*how* much attention it received.
Right.
Well, I personally don't care. If somebody wants to work on
advertising, or even better, work on things which encourage other
people to do advertising for us,
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:36:06AM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Graham Percival writes:
Well, I personally don't care. If somebody wants to work on
advertising, or even better, work on things which encourage other
people to do advertising for us, they're welcome to do so.
Now,
Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org writes:
Graham Percival writes:
At the moment, the top 3 problems for publicity that I see are:
Okay, now we're getting somewhere. I would like to add a top
reason
0. we don't really have a clue what LilyPond's priorities should be,
and where our
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
Umm, have you missed my work on automating patches and fixing the
CG lately? I want to make sure that we treat *current* developers
fairly, before trying to recruit new ones. We've lost a *lot* of
potential effort from Trevor, James, Phil,
2011/12/14 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
2. the old lilypond.org/web/ pages are still up (and probably
still in google's cache), various links point to those, which
gives the impression that our project died 3 years ago or
something.
Some of that work needs to be done by you, me,
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 03:01:23PM +0100, Federico Bruni wrote:
Which kind of work is involved?
python scripts.
There's an issue about it on the tracker?
Probably not. I've pretty much abandoned adding Frog items,
really, since nobody pays attention to them.
I can find just this:
On 14/12/2011 10:21 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
It would be nice if you adding the above to that tracker issue.
Done.
--
Julien
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Here's where we stand.
STABLE RELEASE
Almost everybody wants stable releases more frequently. They
attract positive attention, they get updated docs and bugfixes and
new features into the hands of users, etc. We had the first two
release candidates back in Sep. Unfortunately, we've had
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
STABLE RELEASE
Almost everybody wants stable releases more frequently. They
attract positive attention, they get updated docs and bugfixes and
new features into the hands of users, etc. We had the first two
release candidates back in Sep.
On 11-12-12 04:16 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percivalgra...@percival-music.ca writes:
STABLE RELEASE
Almost everybody wants stable releases more frequently. They
attract positive attention, they get updated docs and bugfixes and
new features into the hands of users, etc. We had the
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 07:06:56AM -0700, Colin Campbell wrote:
FWIW, I've found that GUB on x86-64 Oneiric will choke building
cross-compiled components, with error messages saying unable to
identify extension of x, where x is the x.o form of a tool. This
points, according to GCC, to
13 matches
Mail list logo
