Le mardi 12 janvier 2010 à 14:49 +, Graham Percival a écrit :
> For unstable, yes. But they're not all that cheap for stable -- I
> mean, I'd expect many users to update to a new stable version. But
> there's absolutely no functional difference between 2.12.3 and the
> hypothetical 2.12.4. T
2010/1/12 John Mandereau :
> Le mardi 12 janvier 2010 à 12:31 +, Graham Percival a écrit :
>> now that John's
>> updated stable, I need to drop that work and start figuring out how to
>> get GUB to make 2.12.3-2.
>
> Why not releasing a 2.12.4 instead? Revision numbers (third number of
> the v
Le mardi 12 janvier 2010 à 12:31 +, Graham Percival a écrit :
> now that John's
> updated stable, I need to drop that work and start figuring out how to
> get GUB to make 2.12.3-2.
Why not releasing a 2.12.4 instead? Revision numbers (third number of
the version number) are cheap, aren't they
