Paul Morris writes:
>> On Apr 22, 2016, at 8:07 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> I am currently doing pitch 2 at first-class Scheme engravers and am
>> sorely tempted to scratch the whole macro-based mess and do it via
>> inheritance and templates.
>
> I can’t comment on the implementation questi
Am 23.04.2016 um 07:09 schrieb Paul Morris:
> (Also, while I’m at it, your recent dotted list work, allowing "violin.1”
> etc, is also really nice.)
Oh, I seem to have missed this, but that's great. Finally we can write
indexed parts/variables!
Thanks for adding this, David.
Best
Urs
> On Apr 22, 2016, at 8:07 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> I am currently doing pitch 2 at first-class Scheme engravers and am
> sorely tempted to scratch the whole macro-based mess and do it via
> inheritance and templates.
I can’t comment on the implementation questions, but it will be great to h
> I am currently doing pitch 2 at first-class Scheme engravers and am
> sorely tempted to scratch the whole macro-based mess and do it via
> inheritance and templates.
Sounds OK to me. Thanks for working on this.
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailin
"Trevor Daniels" writes:
> Not really an objection; just a thought. I can't comment on the
> technicalities, and I've every confidence you can carry this through,
> but I wonder about the position of existing compositions that include
> custom C++ engravers in the old (i.e. current) style.
If p
David Kastrup wrote Friday, April 22, 2016 1:07 PM
> I am currently doing pitch 2 at first-class Scheme engravers and am
> sorely tempted to scratch the whole macro-based mess and do it via
> inheritance and templates.
>
> Now the sore point is that the basic type for which Scheme functions are
On 4/22/16 6:07 AM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of David Kastrup"
wrote:
>
>Hi folks,
>
>I am currently doing pitch 2 at first-class Scheme engravers and am
>sorely tempted to scratch the whole macro-based mess and do it via
>inheritance and templates.
>
>Now the sore point is that the basic type f
Hi folks,
I am currently doing pitch 2 at first-class Scheme engravers and am
sorely tempted to scratch the whole macro-based mess and do it via
inheritance and templates.
Now the sore point is that the basic type for which Scheme functions are
defined is that of a Translator. And Engravers and
