On 3/20/22 11:50 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>>> * A glyph should be created for SMuFL's clefChangeCombining
>>>character.
>>
>> Really? Why?
>
> I was following precedent. Bravura includes it, even though it's a
> zero-width empty character.
OK.
>> If this is correct, no glyph is needed
>>> * A glyph should be created for SMuFL's clefChangeCombining
>>> character.
>>
>> Really? Why?
>
> I was following precedent. Bravura includes it, even though it's a
> zero-width empty character.
OK.
>> If this is correct, no glyph is needed at all.
This was a bit sloppy. I meant 'no
High priority issues (I'd like to get these done before I begin
integrating my GSoC work):
* A glyph should be created for SMuFL's clefChangeCombining
character.
Really? Why?
I was following precedent. Bravura includes it, even though it's a
zero-width empty character.
As far as I
Hi Benkő,
On 3/19/22 02:00, Benkő Pál wrote:
Hi Owen,
Owen Lamb ezt írta (időpont: 2022. márc. 19., Szo, 7:38):
Hi Benkő,
On 3/17/22 10:05, Benkő Pál wrote:
re the longest rests:
1. a perfect longa rest and a maxima rest are not the same;
2. a perfect longa rest should take three spaces
Hi Owen,
Owen Lamb ezt írta (időpont: 2022. márc. 19., Szo, 7:38):
>
> Hi Benkő,
>
> On 3/17/22 10:05, Benkő Pál wrote:
>
> re the longest rests:
> 1. a perfect longa rest and a maxima rest are not the same;
> 2. a perfect longa rest should take three spaces (like current
> emmentaler
Hi Benkő,
On 3/17/22 10:05, Benkő Pál wrote:
re the longest rests:
1. a perfect longa rest and a maxima rest are not the same;
2. a perfect longa rest should take three spaces (like current
emmentaler rests.M3mensural), not four (as, I fear, the bravura
mensuralRestLongaPerfecta implies)
3. a
> I've finished mapping the last five glyph categories: Mensural,
> Neomensural, Petrucci, Solesmes, and Kievan. Of those, only the
> Mensural and Neomensural glyphs provided much trouble, but as
> always, extra pairs of eyes are encouraged to spot typos and other
> mistakes or give suggestions
Hi Owen,
first: thanks for this work.
Owen Lamb ezt írta (időpont: 2022. márc. 17., Cs, 16:42):
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've finished mapping the last five glyph categories: Mensural,
> Neomensural, Petrucci, Solesmes, and Kievan. Of those, only the Mensural
> and Neomensural glyphs provided much
Hi all,
I've finished mapping the last five glyph categories: Mensural,
Neomensural, Petrucci, Solesmes, and Kievan. Of those, only the Mensural
and Neomensural glyphs provided much trouble, but as always, extra pairs
of eyes are encouraged to spot typos and other mistakes or give
