Hi Jonas,
I believe my dev/lamb/GSoC-2020-final has to stay up for records
purposes. dev/lamb/smufl is a fork of that branch which I plan to keep
around at least until its changes are successfully integrated into LP. I
don't think dev/lamb/GSoC-2020, my original working branch, is necessary
a
Am Sonntag, dem 10.01.2021 um 12:32 +0100 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld:
> Hi all,
>
> there are currently 38 branches (out of 72 in total) in the canonical
> repository that have a committed date older than 90 days, excluding the
> stable/* branches. I suppose many of these were temporary, abandoned in
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 9:24 PM Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
>> Rune's branch is left around as a tribute, I believe. Back in the day
>> (2.10 or so?) he completed a lot of significant work on Lilypond, then died
>> by suicide.
>>
>>
> I don't think the branch was actively
On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 9:24 PM Carl Sorensen wrote:
> Rune's branch is left around as a tribute, I believe. Back in the day
> (2.10 or so?) he completed a lot of significant work on Lilypond, then died
> by suicide.
>
>
I don't think the branch was actively intended as a tribute; it was just
ne
Rune's branch is left around as a tribute, I believe. Back in the day (2.10 or
so?) he completed a lot of significant work on Lilypond, then died by suicide.
I believe that at this time, it would be appropriate to remove Rune' branch.
But I am only one person.
Thanks,
Carl
On 1/10/21, 4:3
Hi all,
there are currently 38 branches (out of 72 in total) in the canonical
repository that have a committed date older than 90 days, excluding the
stable/* branches. I suppose many of these were temporary, abandoned in
the mean time or simply don't apply anymore. IMHO this might become
problema
