On Nov 8, 2011, at 6:15 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
>
>> Last time I looked lilypond was around 100k lines of code (a quick
>> look says it 200k now
>
> There are some nice tools for this, if anyone really wants to know.
>
>> lilypond may represent 20-40 man years, c
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> Last time I looked lilypond was around 100k lines of code (a quick
> look says it 200k now
There are some nice tools for this, if anyone really wants to know.
> lilypond may represent 20-40 man years, considering I must have put in
> well over 10 personally.
It must b
Graham Percival writes:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 02:55:34AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>> git shortlog -ns|awk '{n+=$1;if(NR<20)print};END{print n}'
>> 1224 Francisco Vila
>>379 Jean-Charles Malahieude
>>172 Valentin Villenave
>>170 David Kastrup
>> 22101
>
2011/11/8 Graham Percival :
> Translators always have way higher commit counts than
> non-translators.
And they are bigger, too.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 02:55:34AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> git shortlog -ns|awk '{n+=$1;if(NR<20)print};END{print n}'
> 1224Francisco Vila
>379Jean-Charles Malahieude
>172Valentin Villenave
>170David Kastrup
> 22101
>
> I have to admit that I was
2011/11/8 Werner LEMBERG :
>> git shortlog -ns|awk '{n+=$1;if(NR<20)print};END{print n}'
>> 6381 Han-Wen Nienhuys
>> 3092 Graham Percival
>> 2474 Jan Nieuwenhuizen
>> 1270 John Mandereau
>> 1224 Francisco Vila
>> 910 Reinhold Kainhofer
>> 78
> git shortlog -ns|awk '{n+=$1;if(NR<20)print};END{print n}'
> 6381Han-Wen Nienhuys
> 3092Graham Percival
> 2474Jan Nieuwenhuizen
> 1270John Mandereau
> 1224Francisco Vila
>910Reinhold Kainhofer
>782Joe Neeman
>574
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 11:38 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> I think the number is way off. AFAICS at
>>> http://www.ohloh.net/p/lilypond/enlistments?page=2, they counted all
>>> stable branches as separate.
>>>
>>> Last time I looked lilypond was around 100k lines of co
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 11:38 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> I think the number is way off. AFAICS at
>>> http://www.ohloh.net/p/lilypond/enlistments?page=2, they counted all
>>> stable branches as separate.
>>>
>>> Last time I looked lilypond was around 100k lines of co
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 11:38 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> I think the number is way off. AFAICS at
>> http://www.ohloh.net/p/lilypond/enlistments?page=2, they counted all
>> stable branches as separate.
>>
>> Last time I looked lilypond was around 100k lines of code (a quick
>> look says it 200k n
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> I think the number is way off. AFAICS at
> http://www.ohloh.net/p/lilypond/enlistments?page=2, they counted all
> stable branches as separate.
>
> Last time I looked lilypond was around 100k lines of code (a quick
> look says it 200k now; I suspect the GNU headers as a
I think the number is way off. AFAICS at
http://www.ohloh.net/p/lilypond/enlistments?page=2, they counted all
stable branches as separate.
Last time I looked lilypond was around 100k lines of code (a quick
look says it 200k now; I suspect the GNU headers as a cause). 390 man
years looks exaggerat
Hello,
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 2:01 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> So I was googling for yaffut to see what I could learn about it, and I
> found that ohloh has a rating system for the projects in its database.
>
> I looked up LilyPond, and found it:
>
> http://www.ohloh.net/p/lilypond
>
>
> The facto
So I was googling for yaffut to see what I could learn about it, and I
found that ohloh has a rating system for the projects in its database.
I looked up LilyPond, and found it:
http://www.ohloh.net/p/lilypond
The factoids about it are very complimentary.
One interesting point -- the estimated
14 matches
Mail list logo
